Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #584054
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Natural background radiation |
| Date | 2016-06-09 05:49 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jjcn2d-u5h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nj9sa2$68r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <n1fm2d-m4e.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <njarge$1va6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 6/8/2016 4:24 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >> Notice that nowhere does it say anything about any cancer caused by >> normal background radiation and in fact it says quite clearly that >> "it is not clear if they have an increased risk of cancer because of" >> being at high altitudes with even higer levels. >> >> Do you understand the meaning of the phrase "beating a dead horse"? >> > > the horses you are reading, are weak watered down general surface > information. it is not what Dr and radiation specialists Xray techs read. I thought not; you can look it up. <snip repeated futile arm waving> -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Natural background radiation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-08 14:39 -0500
Re: Natural background radiation jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-08 21:24 +0000
Re: Natural background radiation Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-08 23:32 -0500
Re: Natural background radiation benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-09 03:41 -0400
Re: Natural background radiation jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 05:49 +0000
Re: Natural background radiation omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-08 19:08 -0700
Re: Natural background radiation eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2016-06-09 07:38 -0700
csiph-web