Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547621
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds |
| Date | Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:21:54 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 13 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <if0dnc-j29.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nc-dnaNE5pSpGz_LnZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <nufanc-i6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <VIadnaL8q_zjOj7LnZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="14330"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/TLrj7ygsmPY32lIixCitz" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:3vvpvxv5B92m0v9DNJJj4KDuU28= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:547621 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/22/16 2:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> But can a long time cut and paste copyright violator changes his stripes? >> > > > Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your Why do you ignore copyrights? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:42 -0600
Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:52 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:23 -0500
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:05 +0100
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 20:27 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:17 -0600
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:21 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:39 -0600
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 14:09 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 16:08 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 17:04 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:25 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:04 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:49 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 14:05 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 22:58 +0000
csiph-web