Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547294
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds |
| Date | 2016-01-22 20:27 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nufanc-i6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nc-dnaNE5pSpGz_LnZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds But can a long time cut and paste copyright violator changes his stripes? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:42 -0600
Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:52 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:23 -0500
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:05 +0100
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 20:27 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:17 -0600
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:21 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:39 -0600
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 14:09 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 16:08 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 17:04 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:25 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:04 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:49 +0000
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 14:05 -0800
Re: Zebra stripes not for camouflage, new study finds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 22:58 +0000
csiph-web