Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #539434
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start |
| Date | 2015-12-15 20:17 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <h396kc-l5n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Po2dnR39eqEPoO3LnZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start >> http://www.npr.org/2015/12/15/459693015/scientists-see-u-n-climate-accord-as-a-good-start-but-just-a-start > > >> Climate researchers' dire warnings about global warming helped spur >> negotiators to draft this unprecedented international agreement, >> which commits both rich and poor countries to rein in greenhouse gas >> emissions in the coming decades. >> >> Some scientists now say they feel relief that the world is finally >> taking climate change seriously. >> >> "The accord signals that the world really gets it," says Jerry >> Melillo, who studies the impact of climate change with the Marine >> Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass. "The world understands >> that climate change is a serious issue and, if left unchecked will >> have catastrophic consequences for society." >> >> Melillo was particularly struck by the debate over whether to aim for >> cap of 2 degrees Celsius in the average increase in global >> temperature, or to try to keep global warming lower ? below 1.5 >> degrees Celsius. "This says to me that the world understands that we >> have to do as much as possible, as soon as possible," he says. >> >> But not everyone was so impressed by that debate over temperature >> targets. >> >> "There was a tremendous amount of discussion about [whether to have] >> a target of 1.5 degrees as opposed to 2 degrees,'" says Kevin >> Trenberth, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric >> Research in Boulder, Colorado. "Without saying how you're going to >> achieve things, I think we will actually blow right through both of >> those things." The "U.N. Climate Accord" was a colossal waste of time an money and is meaningless. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 10:19 -0600
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 16:26 +0000
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start Jürgen Großenbach <jurgengb@adenauer.org> - 2015-12-15 16:43 +0000
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 10:47 -0600
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-15 10:57 -0600
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-15 10:48 -0600
Re: Scientists See U.N. Climate Accord As A Good Start, But Just A Start jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-15 20:17 +0000
csiph-web