Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking

Path	csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.usenet.farm!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking
Date	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:33:03 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	32
Sender	Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID	<f9or2d-hd2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<7dba22f6-7acf-4613-9d73-eaf2383ba2c0@googlegroups.com> <snpo2d-20m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <229853c8-dca1-4b49-896c-5ff868df64a8@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="28129"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19AI5viOtQCPJv87uvpNJcd"
User-Agent	tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock	sha1:GYhGdAKr52bsg4BIoEzp3DogfxY=
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:584271

Show key headers only | View raw

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:46:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of
>> > a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert
>> 
>> At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that
>> does not elect the mayor.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Fullerton has a mayor.Its done by 6 people,and I will change that
> I'm picking up my mayor papers on July 18th.I also will win.Do not
> jump with out the facks .Why would I say it? I do not lie Not ever.
>  TreBert

Those 6 being the members of the City Council.

No individual has the power to change that.

There are no papers for running for Mayor of Fullerton as the Mayor is
not elected by the public.

You can not win an electoral race that does not exist.

You say it because you are an old, befuddled fool that should be in a
home for geezers.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 10:32 -0700
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:09 -0700
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 15:07 -0500
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 18:39 +0000
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 13:48 -0700
      Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 16:09 -0500
        Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-11 12:38 -0700
      Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:33 +0000
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-09 11:58 -0700
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 13:37 -0700
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-12 00:08 +0000

csiph-web