Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #647522
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered |
| Date | 2017-08-28 14:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f0hl29Fm0ngU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <onu3mh$1190$1@gioia.aioe.org> <onu49e$1190$2@gioia.aioe.org> <f0fr3nF9fntU2@mid.individual.net> <onuo0n$34r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 28/08/2017 1:20 AM, Bídníkùm Laterá wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 27/08/2017 7:44 PM, Bídníkùm Laterá wrote: >>> Bídníkùm Laterá wrote: >>> >>>> Without further redo, they are proclaiming, that my Divergent Matter >>>> of the Moving Bodies Model would be inconsistent, since it can't >>>> EXPLAIN Tidal Forces - otherwise extremely correct (my theory). >>>> >>>> However, they willingly forget their own theory, Relativity, is >>>> incapable when it comes to the above Tidal Forces. It can't explain >>>> it, since the curvature is about the observers geometrical projections >>>> and nothing else. >>>> >>>> Hence the punch, a Geometrical Projection cannot possibly make a >>>> region of water to arise above or below a certain level. (without >>>> further redo, >>>> the thing is about Forces and Densities). >>> >>> Thank you for listening to my little story, about Tidal Forces in >>> Relativity. >> >> General relativity covers tidal forces. Sylvia. > > Would you swear that it is as you say? Okay then, I believe you. > Yes. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:34 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:44 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-27 22:09 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 15:20 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-28 14:38 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-28 19:04 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 14:46 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 09:28 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 22:07 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 10:18 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:17 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-31 17:10 +1000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-08-31 02:11 -0500
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000
Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-09-01 03:06 -0700
csiph-web