Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #647413

Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered
Date 2017-08-27 22:09 +1000
Message-ID <f0fr3nF9fntU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <onu3mh$1190$1@gioia.aioe.org> <onu49e$1190$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 27/08/2017 7:44 PM, Bídníkùm Laterá wrote:
> Bídníkùm Laterá wrote:
> 
>> Without further redo, they are proclaiming, that my Divergent Matter of
>> the Moving Bodies Model would be inconsistent, since it can't EXPLAIN
>> Tidal Forces - otherwise extremely correct (my theory).
>>
>> However, they willingly forget their own theory, Relativity, is
>> incapable when it comes to the above Tidal Forces. It can't explain it,
>> since the curvature is about the observers geometrical projections and
>> nothing else.
>>
>> Hence the punch, a Geometrical Projection cannot possibly make a region
>> of water to arise above or below a certain level. (without further redo,
>> the thing is about Forces and Densities).
> 
> Thank you for listening to my little story, about Tidal Forces in
> Relativity.
> 

General relativity covers tidal forces.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:34 +0000
  Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 09:44 +0000
    Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-27 22:09 +1000
      Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-27 15:20 +0000
        Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-28 14:38 +1000
          Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-28 19:04 +0000
            Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 14:46 +1000
              Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 09:28 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-29 22:07 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-29 16:36 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 10:18 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 06:17 +0000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-31 17:10 +1000
                Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-08-31 02:11 -0500
  Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered Bídníkùm Laterá <bila@wehia.ui> - 2017-08-31 08:29 +0000
  Re: Tidal Forces - revisited, still unanswered poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-09-01 03:06 -0700

csiph-web