Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #555578

Re: Hand Grenade Physics

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Hand Grenade Physics
Date Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:26:39 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 22
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <f04spc-5c3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <naet0h02gkf@news3.newsguy.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="9605"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18htJui8F0UekgUubQWqcC/"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:ccJvILFXUrLaKvrBNWQ9AZDiWzo=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:555578

Show key headers only | View raw


Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> wrote:
> During WWII, the American hand grenades were shaped like
> baseballs and thrown in the same manner.
> 
> However, the Germans had "stick grenades" and they were
> thrown differently:
> 
> http://pngimg.com/download/1329
> 
> Is there an advantage to the stick grenade in terms of
> throwing accuracy or distance?
> 
> Which design performs better and why?

Pros: Easier to throw, can throw farther, and don't roll on the ground.

Cons: Heavier and bigger, can carry fewer, and more complex to make.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hand Grenade Physics Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-22 11:56 +0000
  Hand Grenade Physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 04:40 -0800
    Re: Hand Grenade Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 05:23 -0800
      Re: Hand Grenade Physics jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:33 -0800
    Re: Hand Grenade Physics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 13:44 -0500
      Re: Hand Grenade Physics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 12:52 -0600
        Re: Hand Grenade Physics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 16:51 -0800
          Re: Hand Grenade Physics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 21:44 -0500
            Re: Hand Grenade Physics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 20:50 -0600
              Re: Hand Grenade Physics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:56 -0800
  Re: Hand Grenade Physics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 10:41 -0600
    Re: Hand Grenade Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-22 19:13 +0000
  Re: Hand Grenade Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-22 19:26 +0000
    Re: Hand Grenade Physics Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-23 01:57 +0000
      Re: Hand Grenade Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-23 02:19 +0000

csiph-web