Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #588844
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Compression of random binary data |
| Date | 2016-07-12 15:20 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dujd1nF7366U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <87b8a1c6-e14c-47f7-9647-52f4ab874054@googlegroups.com> |
On 12/07/2016 3:50 AM, jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote: > What kind of statistic law or mathematical conjecture or is it even a physical law is violated by compression of random binary data? > > I only know that Shanon theorised it could not be done, but were there any proof? > > What is to say that you can not do it if the symbolic representation is richer than the symbolic represenatation of the dataset. > > Isn't it a fact that the set of squareroots actually depict numbers in a shorter way than their actual representation. > > Now the inpretator or program must know the rules. And i have very good rules to make it happen. > If you consider n bits of data, then there are 2^n different combinations. If your compression of the data is to be reversible, then your compression has to produce 2^n different bit sequences (of varying lengths, typically). If your compression produces some sequences that are shorter than n bits, then it has to produce others that are longer than n bits, otherwise it's impossible to have 2^n different sequences. If some combinations are much more frequent than others, then you can make an overall gain by using shorter sequences for them, at the expense of longer sequences for the rarer combinations. For random data, where each possible combination is equally likely, you're not going to come out ahead. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compression of random binary data jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-07-11 10:50 -0700
Re: Compression of random binary data xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-11 13:12 -0700
Re: Compression of random binary data Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-11 15:42 -0500
Re: Compression of random binary data Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-11 13:58 -0700
Re: Compression of random binary data Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 23:12 +0200
Re: Compression of random binary data "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 15:20 -0700
Re: Compression of random binary data Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-11 21:29 -0500
Re: Compression of random binary data Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 17:48 -0500
Re: Compression of random binary data Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-11 23:39 +0000
Re: One _never_ knows if data is truly random or not. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-12 14:33 +0000
Re: One _never_ knows if data is truly random or not. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 18:37 +0200
Re: One _never_ knows if data is truly random or not. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-12 19:26 -0400
Re: Compression of random binary data Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-12 15:20 +1000
Re: Compression of random binary data Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-12 13:29 -0700
Re: Compression of random binary data Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-13 16:29 +1000
Re: Compression of random binary data Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-07-14 00:54 -0400
csiph-web