Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #585251

Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums!

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums!
Date 2016-06-17 17:32 +1000
Message-ID <dshnbvF2q25U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <ec5cfc7a-7f57-45a8-b813-79b9b8776b4e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 17/06/2016 5:09 AM, Sven Andersson wrote:
> The web-forum Physics Forums censors unwanted postings that are ever so slightly outside the bounds of orthodox science. All it took for me to be banned for life, was three postings arguing for the ideas of Charles S. Cagle! The person that banned me for life is mfb, an "insights author" with 45 "followers". Apparently his insights are excellent when it comes to censorship. Galilei would have everything to fear from this man.
>
> Relativity or quantum physics could never have been even discussed, let alone accepted, if that kind of censorship had been in existence in the early 20th century!
>
> "Read the forum rules please. Peer-reviewed science that is discussed seriously in the scientific community only. Zero relative velocity for fusion is just nonsense."
>
> After this e-mail I was banned for life. Physics Forums don't respond to e-mails. No explanation. No apology. This stinks!
>
> "Peer-reviewed science that is discussed seriously in the scientific community only" Small wonder then, that physics is standing still!
>
> Modern day Galileis like Halton C. Arp would have known more about mfb and the type of "scientist" he represents. And the courageous scientists who make research into earth expansion would too. And many others who go ever so slightly against the accepted dogma...
>
> Last from Arp's book Seeing Red p270:
>
> "Referees
>
> Refereeing or "peer review" as is rather pompously called, is now unworkable. It has increasingly shown that it lets in the bad papers and excludes that good ones, exactly the opposite of what it is supposed to do."
>
> The only thing that peer review guarantees is orthodoxy, nowadays. Complete stasis is the result!
>
> Don't forget either to read on p259 "Big Science as the Medieval Church". A medieval church with mfb-like characters as grand-inquisitors...
>
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>
It's their forum, and they don't want nutters polluting it with junk. 
Nutters invariably think they have something to contribute, but equally 
invariably what they're spouting is just nonsense.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sven Andersson <pairwise.relations@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-16 12:09 -0700
  Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 12:34 -0700
  Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:17 -0700
  Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 22:52 -0700
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 23:27 -0700
      Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:46 -0700
  Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-17 17:32 +1000
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:04 -0700
      Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-18 12:54 +1000
        Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 22:01 -0700
          Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-18 15:06 +1000
            Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 23:37 -0700
      Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 17:06 -0700
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-06-17 07:27 -0400
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-17 10:15 -0500
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 23:05 -0700
      Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-18 22:35 +1000
        Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-18 09:58 -0700
          Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-19 14:10 +1000
            Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-18 23:56 -0700
              Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-19 17:16 +1000
                Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-19 08:24 -0700
              Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 08:04 -0700
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
  Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 13:12 -0700
    Re: Ridiculous, idiotic censorship on Physics Forums! pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-06-18 13:45 -0700

csiph-web