Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #556459

Re: Just As Einstein Predicted?

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Just As Einstein Predicted?
Date 2016-02-25 20:13 +1100
Message-ID <dj7uunFn59aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <04c5cef7-bfb3-418e-ae76-089514426105@googlegroups.com> <d2be2e8c-74ae-443d-a0c0-e8455ceff8d2@googlegroups.com> <DuGdnQ4jK96vUVDLnZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <754f188e-ab10-4fc5-85f5-8153aaaa05ba@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/02/2016 6:57 PM, jay moseley wrote:
> Sam..
>> Nope, just the opposite. General relativity makes very specific predictions. There is no wiggle room. The theory is either right or wrong.
>
>> Every test of General Relativity to date, shows that nature is in agreement.
>
> GR makes no predictions that can also not be made with by a
> classical model. For instance take preccession of mercury. GR
> takes the newtonian prediction, adds in the extra observed
> preccession , and claims this is a successful prediction.
> One could make the same successful "prediction" for classical.
> Take the Newtonian prediction, add in the extra preccession
> and call that a successful prediction for a classical model.

The difficulty with that approach is that it's ad-hoc. For each 
situation you have to include special terms to get from the Newtonian 
prediction to the observed reality. You don't end up with one theory, 
but with as many theories as you have scenarios.

By contrast, general relativity is a single theory that addresses both 
the orbit of Mercury, the behaviour of clocks in orbit, the bending of 
light in a gravitational field, and indeed every other situation it's 
been tested against.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Just As Einstein Predicted? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-23 23:02 -0800
  Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-23 23:56 -0800
    Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 09:28 -0600
      Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-24 23:57 -0800
        Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-25 20:13 +1100
          Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-25 06:44 -0800
            Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 08:57 -0600
              Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:55 -0800
                Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:34 -0600
                Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-02 05:41 -0800
                Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:21 -0600
        Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 08:25 -0600
          Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-25 06:48 -0800
            Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 08:50 -0600
    Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-24 23:15 -0800
      Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-01 14:49 -0800
        Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 16:52 -0600
        Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 17:20 -0600
          Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 21:19 -0500
          Re: Just As Einstein Predicted? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:17 -0800

csiph-web