Re: Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c
Date	Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:00:21 +1100
Lines	9
Message-ID	<dftq25Fnu8hU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<a54eddf9-8ec5-4bde-9c9b-b32b13865810@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net 60yli3Nt00bF1abTtU7wfAgbtOa9rGl6SxaNMJuLNAfDYKMBoj
Cancel-Lock	sha1:MyQNNNVW1bKSB16NAU9lmhbCp9U=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To	<a54eddf9-8ec5-4bde-9c9b-b32b13865810@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:545773

Show key headers only | View raw

On 16/01/2016 1:05 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Reason it does not get from A to B as fast as light it took a bigger
> curve??? I like this thinking for it fits.  TreBert
>

The reason it takes longer is that it's not going as fast. Why would 
some bizarre alternative explanation be required?

Sylvia.

Thread

Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 18:05 -0800
  Re: Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-16 14:00 +1100
    Re: Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 10:47 -0800
  Re: Lets Say When an Electron is up to 99.999999999 of light Its going at c "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 21:49 -0800

csiph-web