Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521585
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's latest brain fart |
| Date | 2015-09-17 05:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d5urrdF55qkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mtc94l$me2$1@dont-email.me> <dvKdnb7YIo_RcmTInZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <om8pcc-ubm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Am 17.09.2015 00:56, schrieb jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com: > In sci.physics Rocky<wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "Bast"<fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mtc94l$me2$1@dont-email.me... >>> The 9/11 official lie is not going to be allowed to go unchallenged >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sOB5PkaaNs >> >> Thanks for the video and it is all so simple. >> >> Only our government would call a place where nukes were detonated Ground >> Zero and then poke fun at those who figured out our government meant to call >> it Ground Zero for the original meaning of the phrase because it really was >> a place where nukes, yes nukes with an 's' were detonated. >> >> Rocky > > It was your beloved media that first called it ground zero, raving lunatic. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any > seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers > as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected > by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the > Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. > > A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a > fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. > > Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it > has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. > > Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available > on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. > > Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any > governmental agency. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. But what was used then? I actually think, that Judy Wood is right and unusual weapons had been used, that utilize the so called 'Hutchison effect'. Hutchison is a 'little' strange guy from Canada. He found certain effects in the early 70th. Those effects he presented to US and Canadian officials and military contractors. Later some 'Canadian officials' destroyed his lab, because they didn't wanted this knowledge to leak out to Germany and Japan (where Hutchison wanted to go). Since Canada is a British colony, someone should ask the Brits, whether or not they had such a weapon. other possibilities: aliens did it or so called 'fallen Angels'... Also the USA could have attacked themselves. But in a way I don't think so, since this would had required a certain degree of smartness, the then president did not posses. TH TH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 22:56 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-17 05:54 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 14:24 +1000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-17 06:50 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:26 +1000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-17 08:26 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-17 17:25 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:18 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-17 17:43 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:30 -0500
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:29 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-18 23:03 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 21:30 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-19 03:19 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 01:40 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-24 22:54 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 21:12 +0000
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:03 -0500
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-25 08:31 +0200
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-26 08:59 +0200
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-26 09:46 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 12:34 +1000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-17 20:48 +0200
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 04:22 +0000
Re: Rocky's latest brain fart "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:04 -0500
Re: AE911 Truth & Firefighters for 911 Truth Demonstrate at NY Times (9-11-15) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:03 -0500
csiph-web