Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572618

Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up as K0oOo0ki kensi the LunkHeaded
LibTard, in <news:nfd5vr$osr$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On 22/04/2016 12:42 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus wrote this long litany of backpedals:

>> Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same
>> as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Took you long enough to.

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and
>> cofunctionality, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Took you long enough to.

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse function of cosine is
>> arccosine, and the inverse function of sine is arcsine, Mathematical
>> Moron?

> Took you long enough to.

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that RMS voltage is a mathematical
>> approximation, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> You previously k'lamed it to be a sine wave rather than just a number. 
> Are you backpedaling on that too, ko0ky?

RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS voltage is still
AC voltage, and can thus be graphed.

<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

SPNAK!

>> Have you figured out yet that there are three methods of
>> mathematically approximating RMS voltage, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> When did you?

Long before Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. He still thinks RMS is an exact
number, not a mathematical approximation. LOL

>> Have you figured out yet the difference between Euler's Theorems and
>> Euler's Formulas, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Still bleating about that, are you?

Still pretending you know what's being discussed, moron? LOL

>> Have you figured out yet that x^2 and 2x are not co-functions,
>> Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Took you long enough to.

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that monomolecular water is not tetrahedral
>> like methane, rather having a bent geometric configuration per the
>> VSEPR theory's AXE method, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

> If you ignore the lone pairs. Include them and it's a tetrahedron, which 
> VSEPR says will have a 104 degree angle between the two hydrogens rather 
> than the perfectly regular tetrahedron angle of 109 degrees, in good 
> agreement with observation. (Lacking a proton to partly screen the 
> valence electrons' charges, the lone pairs repel each other more than 
> the two hydrogens do, stretching the lone pair part of the tetrahedron 
> and thus squeezing the hydrogen part.)

Liar. Water molecules on a monomolecular basis are bent geometry.
Water clusters form icosahedral geometries. You're basing your blather
off a long-disproved water model.

For a water cluster, the H bonds are 109.47 degrees, you fecking 
moron. Not for individual water molecule covalent bonds, which are at 
104.474 degrees for gaseous water, and 105.5 to 106 degrees in bulk 
water. If you're basing tetrahedrality upon water clusters, you can 
arrive at pretty much any geometry you wish... in point of fact, the 
latest and most accurate water model states that water clusters are 
icosahedral. But the individual water molecule, according to the VSEPR 
theory AXE method is bent. Moron.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#elec>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory>
"Bent (H2O)
Tetrahedral (CH4)"

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#lp>
"Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where
the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing
hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although
there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of
substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule
should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus
a pz orbital) is indicated.

SPNAK!

> Can you explain the 104 degree bond angle without the lone pairs, ko0ky?

I just did, moron.

>> Have you figured out yet that the first derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is velocity or slope, Mathematical Moron?
>> LOL

> You mean, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the second derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is acceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> You mean, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the third derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is jerk, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> You mean, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the fourth derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is snap, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> You mean, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the fifth derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is crackle, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> You mean, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that the sixth derivative of the position
>> vector with respect to time is pop, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Your Google cramming is on full display here.

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet what angular velocity is, Mathematical Moron?
>> LOL

> Have you?

Have you figured out yet that the Gaussian curvature of the universe
is not predominantly positive, Spankard? LOL

>> Have you figured out yet that cross correlation can be used with
>> Fourier transforms, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Have you?

Obviously I have. Have you?

>> Have you figured out yet that a sinusoid is a transform of a circle,
>> Mathematical Moron? LOL

> So you're backing off from k'laming that it's a *Fourier* transform of a 
> circle?

Pedantic fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet what the difference is between frequency and
>> period of a sinewave, Mathematical Moron?

> Have you? 'Twasn't that long ago you thought a certain periodic signal 
> would have a period of eight zillion or so when the correct answer was one.
> 
> *snicker*

Wrong.

>> Have you figured out yet that wave interference and superposition are
>> the same thing, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> So, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that wave interference works the same for
>> standing and traveling waves, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> So, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that formulas are math, Mathematical Moron?
>> LOL

> So, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that sin^2 is a sinusoid, Mathematical Moron?
>> LOL

> So, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> Have you figured out yet that atomic number does not equal effective
>> nuclear charge, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> So, you finally have?

Fanfic.

>> a lying backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.

> Oh, don't be so hard on yourself.
> 
> But this long, concentrated litany of all your recent backpedals 

You mean everything I was right about and Shiny Tinfoil Spankard
demonstrated his moronism about? Yet again, Paul Derbyshire is 180
degrees out from reality... my .sig is chock-a-block full of such
instances from Paul 'Lumpy Dumpy Frumpy Slumpy ShroomTard' Derbyshire.
LOL

> suggests to me that Sn!pe could use some competition for that Lance 
> Armstrong Trophy. Consider yourself entered into the race as his 
> competitor. Whoever can go backwards the most vigorously during what 
> remains of the month of April, wins, for fuck's sake.
> 
> *snicker*

Awww, poor Paul... he's so butthurt he's sticking up for Shiny Tinfoil
Spankard, and that spankard is the most-spanked spankard in the
history of Usenet... but Paul's a close second.

Go one, Paul... hand out more of your 'awards from a kook'... show the
world just how butthurt I've made you.

<snicker>

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>

X-Received: by 10.224.215.194 with SMTP id
hf2mr20447108qab.0.1367629316993;
        Fri, 03 May 2013 18:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
y6ni5923qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.67.70.58.178!not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this
 Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
References: <klmos0$ma7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<klpdue$ij8$1@news.albasani.net> <p6cgt.2690$hl7.1582@newsfe14.iad>
	<klsfqm$vnt$5@dont-email.me> <klskpp$uv9$1@dont-email.me>
	<x4ogt.36755$zt4.25500@newsfe15.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
	logging-data="29843";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5876
Lines: 116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
========================================================
========================================================

Adding the Injection-Info: header into an E-S post gets it rejected.
Go on, Paul, do it again, if you claim to be able to do it at will.

Make it exactly this:
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="1.1.1.1";
	logging-data="29843";

Well, Paul? We're waiting. <tap, tap, tap> Nothing, Paul?

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-22 06:42 +0200
  Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-22 08:38 -0400
    Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-23 07:38 +0200
      Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 11:06 -0400
        Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... wod@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Wader of Doom) - 2016-04-23 18:03 +0100
        Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-24 07:04 +0200
          Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-23 22:52 -0700
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-24 17:34 -0400
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-24 22:33 +0000
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-24 17:47 -0700
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-04-24 20:53 -0400
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:36 +0200
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:03 +0200
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-25 01:20 -0600
          Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-24 18:41 +0000
            Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:52 +0200
              Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 11:59 -0400
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 06:38 +0200
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:06 +0000
                Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-27 08:13 +0200
  Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-23 08:48 +0200
    Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 11:07 -0400
      Re: it ain't easy bein' a green lotus... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 17:45 +0000

csiph-web