Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #722239
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx01.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.4--4.35pm.Seattle.2019> (permalink) |
| References | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--2.38pm.Seattle.2019> <q0m7af$crb$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--5.34pm.Seattle.2019> <q0o17i$k54$2@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.4--2.48pm.Seattle.2019> <q0or72$ieo$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. |
| User-Agent | Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM |
| Lines | 12 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@blocknews.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 05 Jan 2019 00:35:13 UTC |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | Fri, 04 Jan 2019 16:35:21 -0800 (Seattle) |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1388 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3023777030 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:722239 comp.os.linux.advocacy:482852 alt.checkmate:245396 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Michael replied: > > Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. > > It's not dying off if Big G is unchanging. It will just be > less relevant over time, at some time in the future. The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. "The Big Freeze" has no kinetic energy, much less gravitational energy. There's no "down" direction. WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:28 -0800
What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-12-27 14:56 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-27 15:05 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 06:49 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:28 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 20:42 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-03 15:13 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 13:01 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:39 -0800
Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-28 17:04 -0800
Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:13 -0700
Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-30 14:27 -0800
Everything dies; gravity is no exception. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-30 14:47 -0800
Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 10:50 -0800
The hot dense sun evaporates into the cold vacuum. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-01 14:21 -0800
Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 13:41 -0500
Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 11:28 -0800
Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 00:15 +0000
What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-01 16:48 -0800
Re: What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 05:14 +0000
A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-01 23:51 -0800
Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-02 11:02 -0600
Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 15:46 +0000
There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-03 14:38 -0800
Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 23:53 +0000
Zero kinetic energy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-03 17:34 -0800
Re: Zero kinetic energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 16:22 +0000
Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-04 14:48 -0800
Re: Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 23:45 +0000
The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-04 16:35 -0800
Re: The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-05 01:24 +0000
Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0700
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-28 20:37 -0800
What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 17:46 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:52 -0800
Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 23:47 -0600
csiph-web