Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe.
Date	2019-01-03 23:53 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<q0m7af$crb$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.1--4.48pm.Seattle.2019> <q0hhb3$g0n$3@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.1--11.51pm.Seattle.2019> <q0lans$mm4$2@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--2.38pm.Seattle.2019>

Show all headers | View raw

Jeff-Relf.Me  @. writes:

>Michael replied:
>> [ a uniform heat bath universe might ] 
>> have potential energy that can _never_ be used as exergy.

>There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe;
>so you can't fall down; kinetic energy isn't possible.

Yet there's still "stuff" separated from each other which would supply 
energy if somehow they could recombine. But it can't.  This is the 
apparent contradiction, can there be potential energy because of gravity 
in a heat-dead universe if it can never be used? All that potential energy
of stuff infinitely far apart.

 >> But my point simply is there is no connection between 
>> the statistics that drive toward a heat death 
>> and the gravitational constant G.  It is a constant.

>So ?!  Big G is irrelevant in a uniform heat bath universe.

Wait a minute, you keep posting stuff like "gravity is dying off" or
"gravity is slowly dying". What does that mean, if not Big G is decreasing 
to zero?

Thread

What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:28 -0800
  What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-12-27 14:56 -0800
    Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-27 15:05 -0800
      Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 06:49 -0800
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:28 -0800
          Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 20:42 -0800
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-03 15:13 -0800
    Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 13:01 -0800
      Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:39 -0800
        Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-28 17:04 -0800
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:13 -0700
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-30 14:27 -0800
            Everything dies; gravity is no exception. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-30 14:47 -0800
              Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 10:50 -0800
                The hot dense sun evaporates into the cold vacuum. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 14:21 -0800
                Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 13:41 -0500
                Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 11:28 -0800
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 00:15 +0000
            What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 16:48 -0800
              Re: What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 05:14 +0000
                A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 23:51 -0800
                Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-02 11:02 -0600
                Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 15:46 +0000
                There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 14:38 -0800
                Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 23:53 +0000
                Zero kinetic energy. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 17:34 -0800
                Re: Zero kinetic energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 16:22 +0000
                Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-04 14:48 -0800
                Re: Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 23:45 +0000
                The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-04 16:35 -0800
                Re: The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-05 01:24 +0000
                Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0700
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-28 20:37 -0800
  What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 17:46 -0800
  Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:52 -0800
  Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 23:47 -0600

csiph-web