Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off.

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx02.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type	Text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.4--2.48pm.Seattle.2019> (permalink)
References	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.1--11.51pm.Seattle.2019> <q0lans$mm4$2@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--2.38pm.Seattle.2019> <q0m7af$crb$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--5.34pm.Seattle.2019> <q0o17i$k54$2@pcls7.std.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off.
User-Agent	Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM
Lines	14
X-Complaints-To	abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 04 Jan 2019 22:48:35 UTC
Organization	blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date	Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:48:43 -0800 (Seattle)
X-Received-Bytes	1367
X-Received-Body-CRC	541082455
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:722231

Show key headers only | View raw

Michael replied:
> > General Relativity's G is a constant, of course;
> 
> So what was all that about "gravity is slowly dying" then?

I'm just repeating myself, I don't know how you could possibly
fail to understand what I'm talking about; to wit:

    Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off.

In "The Big Freeze" there's no kinetic energy,
much less gravitational energy.   There's no "down" direction.

WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

Thread

What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:28 -0800
  What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-12-27 14:56 -0800
    Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-27 15:05 -0800
      Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 06:49 -0800
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:28 -0800
          Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 20:42 -0800
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-03 15:13 -0800
    Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 13:01 -0800
      Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:39 -0800
        Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-28 17:04 -0800
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:13 -0700
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-30 14:27 -0800
            Everything dies; gravity is no exception. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-30 14:47 -0800
              Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 10:50 -0800
                The hot dense sun evaporates into the cold vacuum. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 14:21 -0800
                Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 13:41 -0500
                Re: Everything dies; gravity is no exception. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 11:28 -0800
          Re: Gravity is slowly dying, R.I.P. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 00:15 +0000
            What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 16:48 -0800
              Re: What doesn't evaporate, sublimate, and degrade ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-02 05:14 +0000
                A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-01 23:51 -0800
                Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-02 11:02 -0600
                Re: A PERFECTLY uniform universe has no exergy/gravity. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 15:46 +0000
                There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 14:38 -0800
                Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-03 23:53 +0000
                Zero kinetic energy. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-03 17:34 -0800
                Re: Zero kinetic energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 16:22 +0000
                Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-04 14:48 -0800
                Re: Gravity is residual exergy, and it's dying off. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-04 23:45 +0000
                The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-04 16:35 -0800
                Re: The gravitational energy of our Universe is asymptotically approaching zero. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-05 01:24 +0000
                Re: There's no "down" in a uniform heat bath universe. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0700
        Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-28 20:37 -0800
  What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 17:46 -0800
  Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:52 -0800
  Re: What if The Universe was Falling in,and Not Out Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 23:47 -0600

csiph-web