Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #603141

Re: Raindrop Gravity

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2016-10-31 12:17 -0700
References (15 earlier) <nullhh$l8n$1@dont-email.me> <12c1976d-7617-4253-8693-c2b979e80c1f@googlegroups.com> <nv5d6g$o46$1@dont-email.me> <ec42058c-f1fc-4e0e-87b8-f1f5d50783f0@googlegroups.com> <nv80eg$nol$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID <85797335-e7bf-499f-b9d9-e23da56f95d3@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Raindrop Gravity
From noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

this is only his interpretation of the experiment,
before any experiment was concieved

> 1905 - Einstein - photoelectricity effect and many later experiments
> of quantum physic and chemistry. Wave only classical light theory
> is dead for very long time.
> 
> > If it's something like the Delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
> > then you are out of luck. This is an experiment that plays with polarisation
> > only and is consistent at all levels with a classical model. 
> > Like OAM and SAM.
> > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_KekfbrzO74
> 
> A light beam of power P and frequency f
> provides P/(h.f) photons, each of AM -1/0/+1 . h.
> therefore maximum rate of providing SAM related to the polarization
> is +/- P/f
> 
> OAM of light can provide OM rate +/- N . P/f
> with OM / per photon n . f
> 
> > 
> >> You confuse intrinsic photon angular momentum 
> >> with angular momentum of collective photon propagation. 
> > 
> > No I don't. You never mentioned individual vs groups of photons . 
> > You said above that an OAM beam has angular momentum several
> > times bigger than a spin angular momentum beam. What could that mean
> > but greater angular momentum for the OAM light beam. And I responded
> > by saying that this is an interesting fact (if it were true.)
> > You never specified that you meant a group of photons have more 
> > momentum than an individual photon. 
> > If you had, I would have not responded to something so obvious.
> > 
> Yes, it is obvious tha OM n., abs(n) > 1
> cannot be provided by polarization.
> 
> -- 
> Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
> Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 14:18 -0700
  Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 15:12 -0700
  Re: Raindrop Gravity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-23 05:01 +0000
    Re: Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 22:38 -0700
      Re: Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 22:48 -0700
        Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 10:03 +0200
        Re: Raindrop Gravity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-23 18:13 +0000
        Re: Raindrop Gravity "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 16:34 -0700
      Re: Raindrop Gravity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-23 18:10 +0000
  Raindrop Gravity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 01:55 -0700
    Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 04:05 -0700
      Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 13:10 +0200
        Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 13:20 +0200
          Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-23 06:42 -0700
            Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 15:47 +0200
              Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-23 06:57 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 16:09 +0200
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-23 07:54 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 22:05 +0200
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-23 16:00 -0500
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 02:42 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:57 +0200
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 12:02 +0200
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:21 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 20:57 +0200
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-28 10:24 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 13:14 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-30 02:46 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 19:12 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:35 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 18:53 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:17 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 21:19 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 21:26 +0100
                gravity isn't noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 16:25 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 04:55 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 20:31 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 02:04 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 02:12 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:26 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 02:20 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 10:41 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-01 04:41 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 20:21 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-02 03:57 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 16:22 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 02:23 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 13:57 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-04 12:49 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 11:45 -0800
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-02 04:13 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 16:26 +0100
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 02:30 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 20:58 +0100
                cm = E/c noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:48 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-03 01:47 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-01 02:20 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-29 08:04 -0700
                Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 09:08 -0500
            Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 09:07 -0500
      Re: Raindrop Gravity "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 16:34 -0700
        Re: Raindrop Gravity "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:35 -0700
          Re: Raindrop Gravity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-23 19:06 -0700
          Re: Raindrop Gravity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 07:30 -0700
      Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 09:04 -0500
  Re: Raindrop Gravity Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-23 15:10 -0700
    Re: Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 15:48 -0700
    Re: Raindrop Gravity jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 03:02 -0700
  Re: Raindrop Gravity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-25 06:33 -0700
    Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 09:30 -0500
      Re: Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 08:16 -0700
        Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
          Re: Raindrop Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 14:26 -0700
            Re: Raindrop Gravity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-28 16:37 -0700
            Re: Raindrop Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:12 -0500

csiph-web