Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #555552

Re: Hey DildoRider...

From Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References <5a525f2728af26001cc50858601bde1e@dizum.com> <rtpicb5auonlkgnna9o0fc24876fl8sei1@4ax.com> <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> <kkelcbhdec4mu10f68qu6o44orql0va9v6@4ax.com>
Subject Re: Hey DildoRider...
Message-ID <84e77a032dfdfc7de685a0aeb8dc0120@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-02-22 19:35 +0100
Newsgroups alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:kkelcbhdec4mu10f68qu6o44orql0va9v6@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
>>>> should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate*
>>>> to create *sinusoids*),

>>> And it's not.

>> And it is, you're just a moron.
>> 
>> Already posted (three times), and you avoided it (three times), so
>> I'll post it again:
>> 
>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
>> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
>> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

Now that Shiny Tinfoil Brain has gotten a clue, he's going to
immediately try to give it away so he remains blissfully clueless. LOL

> Here's another free clue, Fakey.

No, hold onto those... you're so lacking in clue, you need every one
you can get. LOL

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that superposition
was the same as wave interference; that wave interference works the
same for standing or traveling waves; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt
RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron
continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

<http://i.imgur.com/Em4KS1b.png>

SPNAK!

<snicker>

> Use it wisely, because it might be your last one...

You're... you're giving away your last clue? Well, I knew you were
close to being totally clueless, but this confirms it. LOL

> In order to graph a complex function in time, you need a 3
> (three) dimension plot.

You'll be getting right on detailing what, exactly, you're plotting in
that third dimension to juxtapose it against voltage on the Y axis and
time on the X axis when plotting voltage vs. time for sinewaves, Shiny
Tinfoil Brain.

> Can you guess how to label the 3 axes?

No, because I have no idea what you're blathering about. I suspect
*you* have no idea what you're blathering about, it's just that you
spent all night raping Google, found some web page that you thought
you could use to divert attention away from the fact that you've
proven yourself to be a dimwitted moron, then leapt to Usenet to bleat
more.

Are you perhaps referring to the S-plane, the complex plane on which
Laplace transforms are graphed, where instead of viewing time-domain
processes, the functions are modeled in the frequency domain?

Or are you perhaps referring to the fact that a circularly symmetric
function transforms via Fourier equation to a Bessinc shape in a 3-D
Euclidean-space complex-plane plot, thereby establishing the time axis
x, the amplitude axis y, the real axis z, the orthogonal imaginary
axis Z, which I've already discussed?

Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to 
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, 
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as 
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier 
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, 
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* 
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval 
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle 
periodic functions."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of 
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."

Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't 
it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's 
Formula"

Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS 
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.

<http://i.imgur.com/SMRGcQY.png>

SPNAK!
=========================================================

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.

Spankard. Moron. LOL

> Got it?
> Get busy.

<http://i.imgur.com/Em4KS1b.png>

A properly graphed example of 3-phase wye electrical service. The 170
volt peak hot legs are in the first three equations, which results in
the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first-resultants as graphed, which result in
the 208.207 volt RMS L-L second-resultant, only one of which is
graphed.

SPNAK! on DildoRider and, by extension, Shiny Tinfoil Brain who
continues to demonstrate that he can't understand how the Euler
sinewave summation equation works.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 07:20 +0100
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 15:50 +0800
    Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-21 08:04 +0000
    Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:30 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:55 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:48 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 23:16 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:10 +0100
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 11:55 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 10:56 -0800
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 16:25 -0800
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:50 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:42 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 00:52 -0800
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:02 -0700
            Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 09:30 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 10:39 -0700
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:35 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 08:20 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 23:05 +0100
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:34 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 19:38 -0500
                Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-24 09:45 +0000
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:51 -0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:52 -0800
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-21 02:55 -0700

csiph-web