Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #689401
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 17:50 -0700 |
| References | <699c8afc-c028-4eff-9738-e26a04870fed@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <7ebc15bb-8032-4cf2-bfed-e9ca4fc020fb@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | is the magnetic monopole at .5MeV a unique particle in all of physics with its charge energy // TRUE CHEMISTRY textbook |
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
As to why the tau exists, would be the same sort of question as to why osmium exists or bismuth exists as elements. There the answer is that every number from 1 to 118 (however far we discovered the elements) is represented by a chemical element. In the same view, every number combination of .5, 105, 137 represents a physics elementary particle, considering quantum gaps. Now examine tau particle again, for it is 1784 MeV and the muon is 105 MeV. Check its Sigma error. 1784/ 105 = 16.99.... and definitely the tau is but 17 muons stacked together, whereas the proton at 840MeV is 8 muons stacked together. So why is there a gap of 1 to 17 for leptons? Well, there is probably no gap if we listed all the particles and their MeV's ever witnessed in high energy physics. We probably have every one of these particles "seen before". 105 105 x 2 105 x 3 105 x 4 105 x 5 . . . And every one of those particles would be a mirror image of say hydrogen 1 helium 2 lithium 3 beryllium 4 boron 5 carbon 6 . . . This places into focus our next question, dealing with Dirac's magnetic monopole which is the .5MeV particle, having either a +1 charge energy of .5MeV or a -1 charge energy of .5MeV. Dirac claimed most of his life that a magnetic monopole had to exist, because electricity is quantized with charge, so a particle had to be the quantized charge particle. But that then begs a question, is .5MeV the smallest charge energy monopole? Can we get a .49MeV magnetic monopole? I believe the answer is no. That .5MeV of either 0 charge, -1 charge or +1 charge is unique to the .5MeV. Sure, you can get photon particles varying in 2eV all the way up to .5MeV and beyond .5MeV. But only at .5MeV can you get a unique charge energy particle. So we have photons of all sizes of eV or MeV energies, a continuum of wavelength, and these are waves for photons cannot have rest mass, which simply means that photons are 1/2 toruses, never full toruses, for to be a full torus you are a particle. So, that leaves us with a dilemma of sorts, is Physics constructed such that you have a spectrum of values for the photon energy from 1 eV up to and beyond .5MeV and yet only at .5MeV can you have a charged photon as magnetic monopole? If true, why would physics have only one value for a charged magnetic monopole? Perplexing question. AP
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
50- Unification of Periodic Table of Chemical Elements with Table of Elementary Physics Particles is a Faraday Law unification// TRUE CHEMISTRY textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 14:52 -0700
is the magnetic monopole at .5MeV a unique particle in all of physics with its charge energy // TRUE CHEMISTRY textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:50 -0700
is the magnetic monopole at .5MeV a unique particle in all of physics with its charge energy // TRUE CHEMISTRY textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 19:32 -0700
Re: is the magnetic monopole at .5MeV a unique particle in all of physics with its charge energy // TRUE CHEMISTRY textbook poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 20:49 -0700
csiph-web