Re: Linux 6.13.7

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Linux 6.13.7
Date	2025-03-15 17:33 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<67D61C3E.4D8D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <m3hu3iF3jc9U2@mid.individual.net> <182ca48b6c299c15$32886$5317$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <vr26u4$23r7g$1@dont-email.me> <67D5C74F.6B46@ix.netcom.com> <bsubtj10e057j40tpngchovgjeki24vqkp@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Joel wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >Physfitfreak wrote:
> >> On 3/14/25 5:27 AM, Farley Flud wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 05:45:22 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Meanwhile, my NVMe devices are much, much faster than
> >> >> your spinning rust archaisms.
> >> >
> >> > That is quite irrelevant.
> >> >
> >> > All computation is performed in cache/RAM and the attached drives,
> >> > of whatever kind, play no role.  Even heavy disk I/O is always
> >> > buffered in RAM.
> >> >
> >> > Thus, the gimmicky SSDs are only useful as a badge of technical
> >> > fashion, just like spoilers on a car.
> >>
> >> Hm.. ? I have almost identical machines, one with SSD and the other with
> >> HD, same RAM (12 gigs). The one with SSD is noticeably faster than the
> >> other.
> >
> >SSD Sucks!
> 
> BS.


you plug in the ssd and error reads; cannot find ssd.



it's unstable.

Thread

Re: Linux 6.13.7 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:26 -0500
  Re: Linux 6.13.7 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-03-15 10:53 +0000
  Re: Linux 6.13.7 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-15 11:30 -0700
    Re: Linux 6.13.7 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-15 18:14 -0400
      Re: Linux 6.13.7 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-15 17:33 -0700
      Re: Linux 6.13.7 Scott Doty <s.doty@ewing.con> - 2025-03-16 03:50 -0400

csiph-web