Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: Linux 6.13.7 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 17:33:02 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 33 Message-ID: <67D61C3E.4D8D@ix.netcom.com> References: <182ca48b6c299c15$32886$5317$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <67D5C74F.6B46@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 01:32:45 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="53cdbd2ccacf97c070ad526b7851ef60"; logging-data="680545"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+GXD/i4P7wGfXAFob0zO1RNZ+atuZRZSQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:hOXOZRzloesSWWTsZQz4Gwyx3Fk= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250315-4, 03/15/2025), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:687514 sci.physics.relativity:661906 sci.physics:891875 Joel wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >Physfitfreak wrote: > >> On 3/14/25 5:27 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > >> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 05:45:22 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> > > >> >> Meanwhile, my NVMe devices are much, much faster than > >> >> your spinning rust archaisms. > >> > > >> > That is quite irrelevant. > >> > > >> > All computation is performed in cache/RAM and the attached drives, > >> > of whatever kind, play no role. Even heavy disk I/O is always > >> > buffered in RAM. > >> > > >> > Thus, the gimmicky SSDs are only useful as a badge of technical > >> > fashion, just like spoilers on a car. > >> > >> Hm.. ? I have almost identical machines, one with SSD and the other with > >> HD, same RAM (12 gigs). The one with SSD is noticeably faster than the > >> other. > > > >SSD Sucks! > > BS. you plug in the ssd and error reads; cannot find ssd. it's unstable.