Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #728529

Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background.

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:00:48 -0600
Message-ID <5C6F03E9.6677@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:02:49 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background.
References <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16--7.04pm.Seattle.2019> <gd6t9fF8aqdU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.21--0.48am.Seattle.2019>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 190221-2, 02/21/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Lines 25
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-vT20ntc7EiaByU3aGyY+tJNO29uv6aIiE0vc8Z04D7eDk1dGrzm8AbqledwNYAH+9yEvQOTMOO2g1a4!M/EybN9Zx2qOXXVaGqdtoGC3iJZTdtRh/QMDlPaPKrnlp2T3wLtEguUTFAZFIHkb9noNYxZnqufn!Wy3KL4ppLks=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2027
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:728529 sci.astro:61821 sci.physics.relativity:484210 comp.os.linux.advocacy:487612

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
> 
> Sylvia to me:
> > > 95% of our galaxy is "dark matter" ( unseen mass );
> > > it's spherical, like earth, not a disk,
> > > and it's denser in the middle, like earth.
> > >
> > > What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ?
> > > Just because we haven't seen it, doesn't mean it isn't viewable.
> >
> > [ We're limited to 3 "improbable/meaningless" options ]
> 
> Good thing your "eyesight" and IMAGINATION are flawless, right ?
> 
> Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background
> might've blinded us, so we can't see "Meta-ColdDarkMatter"
> ( mCDM; cold, decayed particles; LOW ENERGY physics ).



Take a grape..
cut it in
four parts
and
put it inside a microwave oven...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-16 19:04 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:44 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:57 -0500
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 10:03 -0800
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-17 14:46 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:16 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-22 09:49 -0600
  Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:03 +1100
    Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-21 00:48 -0800
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:18 +1100
      Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 12:02 -0800
    Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 23:40 -0800
      Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-22 19:20 +1100
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 01:44 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Wade Alvarado <waal@ocwf4ds.ic> - 2019-02-22 14:49 +0000
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-23 09:03 +1100
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 19:45 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:33 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-22 10:39 -0800
          Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 10:24 -0800
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 13:30 -0500
            Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 23:42 -0800
        Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 10:51 -0800

csiph-web