Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #728529
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:00:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5C6F03E9.6677@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:02:49 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. |
| References | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16--7.04pm.Seattle.2019> <gd6t9fF8aqdU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.21--0.48am.Seattle.2019> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 190221-2, 02/21/2019), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 25 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-vT20ntc7EiaByU3aGyY+tJNO29uv6aIiE0vc8Z04D7eDk1dGrzm8AbqledwNYAH+9yEvQOTMOO2g1a4!M/EybN9Zx2qOXXVaGqdtoGC3iJZTdtRh/QMDlPaPKrnlp2T3wLtEguUTFAZFIHkb9noNYxZnqufn!Wy3KL4ppLks= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2027 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:728529 sci.astro:61821 sci.physics.relativity:484210 comp.os.linux.advocacy:487612 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote: > > Sylvia to me: > > > 95% of our galaxy is "dark matter" ( unseen mass ); > > > it's spherical, like earth, not a disk, > > > and it's denser in the middle, like earth. > > > > > > What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? > > > Just because we haven't seen it, doesn't mean it isn't viewable. > > > > [ We're limited to 3 "improbable/meaningless" options ] > > Good thing your "eyesight" and IMAGINATION are flawless, right ? > > Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background > might've blinded us, so we can't see "Meta-ColdDarkMatter" > ( mCDM; cold, decayed particles; LOW ENERGY physics ). Take a grape.. cut it in four parts and put it inside a microwave oven...
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-16 19:04 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:44 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:57 -0500
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 10:03 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-02-17 14:46 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:16 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-22 09:49 -0600
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:03 +1100
Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-02-21 00:48 -0800
Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:18 +1100
Re: Staring into the "hot fire" of the microwave background. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 12:02 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-21 23:40 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-22 19:20 +1100
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-22 01:44 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Wade Alvarado <waal@ocwf4ds.ic> - 2019-02-22 14:49 +0000
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-23 09:03 +1100
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 19:45 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2019-02-23 04:33 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-22 10:39 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 10:24 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 13:30 -0500
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 23:42 -0800
Re: What are the chances that we're just blind(ed) ? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 10:51 -0800
csiph-web