Re: speed of light was actually faster right

Message-ID	<583C78CA.4E90@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-11-28 10:34 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: speed of light was actually faster right
References	<583C76A4.6305@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> A new proposed experiment to test Einstein's concept of the speed of light traveling at a constant rate could turn the theory of relativity on its head.
> 
> In a new study two scientists report that they believe the speed of light was actually faster right when the big bang happened than it currently is.
> 
> http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/28/scientists-challenge-einsteins-theory-on-speed-of-light/21615688/
> 
> Since i'm the genuies here I can verify that Einstein's speed of light has always been wrong.
> 
> When Albert Einstein built the atomic bomb he thought it
> was going to be a little bomb, ...it turn out much bigger than he
> thought because he never knew what the 'speed' of light really was.
> 
> If yous don't get these numbers right...you could blow up the whole earth!
> 
> I'll go get a ruler and measure it myself...
> 
> i don't fukin trust you guys.
> 
> You are NOT to be trusted.


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161125084229.htm



I look at E=mc2 and
I see that
enegry is mass and mass is energy..
but there is no reason why the 
c2
speed of light should be there.

It's wrong.

It's just a ...fix. 


There are a lot of stuff that travel faster than the speed of light..
'thought' travels faster than the speed of light.

The properties of thought are different than the properties of light.

I can see the light coming..

Thread

speed of light was actually faster right  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-28 10:25 -0800
  Re: speed of light was actually faster right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-28 10:34 -0800
    no skwares were consulted\abused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 10:59 -0800
    Re: speed of light was actually faster right "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-28 17:24 -0800
      Re: speed of light was actually faster right noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 14:32 -0800
  Re: speed of light was actually faster right Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-28 13:16 -0600
    Re: speed of light was actually faster right Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-28 13:35 -0600
      Re: speed of light was actually faster right "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 14:13 -0800
        Re: speed of light was actually faster right jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:32 +0000
          Re: speed of light was actually faster right benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:13 -0500
            Re: speed of light was actually faster right jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:13 +0000
          Re: speed of light was actually faster right noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 18:08 -0800
        Re: speed of light was actually faster right "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-02 17:47 -0800
  Re: speed of light was actually faster right "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-28 17:16 -0800
    Re: speed of light was actually faster right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-29 00:08 -0800
  Re: speed of light was actually faster right "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 14:00 -0800
    Re: speed of light was actually faster right "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 16:12 -0800

csiph-web