Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:34:50 -0600
Message-ID: <583C78CA.4E90@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:34:50 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy,
Subject: Re: speed of light was actually faster right
References: <583C76A4.6305@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-MdDUh6rexQvfsBznAqBuu1Z8pcgt/OB3rmeY31KZq1UVR+YaW439tG+QQVZokXKTY5IduIua/OiCyMy!6GPJELbsy+Cvo93fOQ1JC0uZV9VdkNFpb8xX/kL38FQX6bMFtG0+hdjbNIASm+0ZBG5L1MHfYBZE!HX6a6kjMR04=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2531
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:458354 sci.physics:606845 sci.physics.relativity:400053 alt.astronomy:287794

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> A new proposed experiment to test Einstein's concept of the speed of light traveling at a constant rate could turn the theory of relativity on its head.
> 
> In a new study two scientists report that they believe the speed of light was actually faster right when the big bang happened than it currently is.
> 
> http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/28/scientists-challenge-einsteins-theory-on-speed-of-light/21615688/
> 
> Since i'm the genuies here I can verify that Einstein's speed of light has always been wrong.
> 
> When Albert Einstein built the atomic bomb he thought it
> was going to be a little bomb, ...it turn out much bigger than he
> thought because he never knew what the 'speed' of light really was.
> 
> If yous don't get these numbers right...you could blow up the whole earth!
> 
> I'll go get a ruler and measure it myself...
> 
> i don't fukin trust you guys.
> 
> You are NOT to be trusted.


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161125084229.htm



I look at E=mc2 and
I see that
enegry is mass and mass is energy..
but there is no reason why the 
c2
speed of light should be there.

It's wrong.

It's just a ...fix. 


There are a lot of stuff that travel faster than the speed of light..
'thought' travels faster than the speed of light.

The properties of thought are different than the properties of light.

I can see the light coming..