Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #601305
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:01:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58051241.369A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:02:41 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Two Trillion Galaxies, |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 17 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-cnxVX3Y2VbkZXwVYVzhujvKl0ihx7tjIrtLsRtdRRBIEFTkV/Y8/y8hEGg+9JNuEV0ZECuRTjcQcM1u!6LkRKCiXJ6CmZsJHaHn6WKcaRGwH+dC2RJ/9cZDj6VbDa6sL+5dDI2JHhHDQr1Ikl1emsYykuW5B!vnXe43WlNkk= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1417 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1539 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 1495794202 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:454243 sci.physics:601305 sci.physics.relativity:395931 alt.astronomy:286846 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/science/two-trillion-galaxies-at-the-very-least.html?_r=0 How long do you think it will take for 'these people' to change the age of the universe to a trillion years???? first 'they' have to learn how to say the word...trillion. they might have to look it up on the internet first... of course the rest of yous are just going to ...wait.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:56 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 18:19 +0200
meters per period noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:52 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 11:55 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 15:00 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 12:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:01 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:00 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 14:23 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:26 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:24 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:27 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:47 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 17:02 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:33 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:24 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 16:58 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:18 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-19 19:58 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:47 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200
csiph-web