Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #601439

Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,

Message-ID <5805A41C.8C9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,
References <58051241.369A@ix.netcom.com> <6a60b76a-feb3-4e42-ab9d-f23f5ae8797f@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

tsbrueni@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 11:01:46 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/science/two-trillion-galaxies-at-the-very-least.html?_r=0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > How long do you think it will take for 'these people' to change the age
> > of the universe to a trillion years????
> >
> >
> >
> > first 'they' have to learn how to say the word...trillion.
> >
> >
> > they might have to look it up on the internet first...
> >
> >
> > of course the rest of yous are just going to ...wait.
> 
> The Universe has a lot more living space than we thought!


The Earth has a lot more living space than you are ...told.



Just because you cannot find an apartment in New York City doesn't mean we need to go to Mars...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
  two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:56 -0700
    Re: two trillion meters per wave Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 18:19 +0200
      meters per period noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:52 -0700
    Re: two trillion meters per wave edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 11:55 -0700
      Re: two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 15:00 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 12:30 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-20 10:20 +0100
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:01 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 13:52 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:00 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 14:23 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:26 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:24 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:27 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:47 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 17:02 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:33 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:24 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 16:58 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:18 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-19 19:58 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:32 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:47 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200

csiph-web