Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #593972

Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical.

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 2:04:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> []
> Replying to yourself may be a sign of mental issues, Star.
> Try to calm down.
> >
> > In otherwords..
> >
> > Can you name anyone in the 'scientific community' that will say,
> > “I have no reason to believe that there is something real
> > behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'”
> > ?
> >
> I think you could find lots of them.
> I certainly take the view that UFOs are exactly that:
> Unidentified lying Objects.
> Did you see something, sure I believe you did.


There is nothing in Einstein's quote that mentions the word... "Unidenified".

It reads "Flying Saucers". It also doesn't mention 'Unidentified flying Objects', ir reads .."Flying Saucers"!


“I have no reason to believe that there is something real behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'” Source: Einstein Archives


Any two year old knows Einstein is talking about "Flying Saucers" from outer space. Are you one years old???




So that makes all your other comments...irrevelant.


Get real, will you? Real! 



And don't come into my threads changing 'words' around! Do I make myself clear?





> 
> Do I then leap from that to visitors from outer space?
> Well, applying Occam's razor seems to put a stop to that for me.
> There's just not enough credible evidence we have been visited.
> 
> On the other hand, the likelihood that other life is out there
> just seems to have high odds. The fact that we have not yet
> been able to visit them, is another argument for why they
> might not be able to visit us. It just might take resources
> that aren't available to mortal beings.
> 
> >
> > You cannot, because...there is no one out there that is
> > in touch with reality, they don't know what 'real' is.
> 
> Repeating your argument is not logical proof of your point.
> I named myself and invite you to talk to those you accuse
> of ignoring reality to find out what their views.
> []
> >
> > The only conclusion I can come up with is...they are stupid.
> > They forgot to take a 'reality' course in skool.
> 
> You draw conclusions without investigating the facts.
> Another sign of sloppy logic.
> 
> >
> > Isn't there any professors that can tell their
> > students..."There are no FUCKIN FLYING SAUCERS!" ?
> >
> Well, knowing that there have been experimental models
> and even toy "FLYING SAUCERS", I think you will have a
> hard time finding such a science teacher.
> 
> > Or, just keep them stupid...
> >
> Insults are not a good logical tool.
> 
> > On the other hand...if you tell people
> > "There is no Life on Mars." how are they going to make money??
> > How are you going to sell NASA and science fiction books???
> 
> Conspiracy theories. Now you have reached the bottom.
> If you are willing to listen, we may be able to help you
> out of that pit you got yourself into.
> ed

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
  Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 13:32 -0700
  Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
  Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
    Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:47 -0500
      Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 12:10 -0700
        Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 12:29 -0700
          Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 13:44 -0700
          Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-15 16:51 -0700
        Re: Your S.S. check. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 13:42 -0700
          Re: Your S.S. check. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-15 17:14 -0700
            Re: Your S.S. check. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-16 13:14 -0700
              Re: Your S.S. check. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-16 13:44 -0700
      Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-15 18:01 -0400
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 15:32 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 08:45 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 10:31 -0700
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:37 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-17 17:52 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-18 13:23 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-18 22:17 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-19 11:04 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:59 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:18 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-22 23:30 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-22 23:54 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-23 10:36 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:37 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:34 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 20:49 -0400
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-18 20:25 -0500
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:22 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 10:10 -0500
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 08:35 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 13:57 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 16:37 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "Henrietta Testicockles" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-08-19 19:24 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 04:11 -0700
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:27 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:13 -0700
      Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
      Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:32 -0700
      Re: Reduce your meds. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-20 11:44 -0700
        Re: MrAA believes in magic; to wit: a HeadsTailsSuperposition. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-21 13:46 -0700
  Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:27 -0700
    Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 09:38 -0700
      Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 10:27 -0700
        Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 10:41 -0700
          Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 15:11 -0700
              Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-22 23:26 -0700
                Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 10:46 -0700
      Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 10:44 -0700
      mism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 16:15 -0700
        Re: mism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:46 -0700
  Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:04 -0700

csiph-web