Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #591509

Re: The Next Game

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:13:09 -0500
Message-ID <579F7513.2CFB@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:13:07 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject Re: The Next Game
References <5791C9A2.6FE6@ix.netcom.com> <579321CF.320D@ix.netcom.com> <5793252C.3514@ix.netcom.com> <5793E334.71BB@ix.netcom.com> <579409F8.4049@ix.netcom.com> <57950967.CFA@ix.netcom.com> <57951779.AED@ix.netcom.com> <57951925.454E@ix.netcom.com> <57954842.10F7@ix.netcom.com> <579931CC.6485@ix.netcom.com> <57995955.40C3@ix.netcom.com> <5799A1DC.612C@ix.netcom.com> <579A3AE3.934@ix.netcom.com> <579A868F.FF8@ix.netcom.com> <579BA62E.4DEF@ix.netcom.com> <579F0CCE.53BF@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 176
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-WD4qVkFrC7WUfXafhWQvZPjV4lDR0cD1l/xdEEC58Hnw+B+qcpW19SwcLrCT4b+Vx/4lzyoz1mBBGzz!LMOnOItGSHWzIp9xcX4l6FA2y9tidhQfEvlzjY6JY6gaM8tYertMw0tnNjujCUaK4OUbtnUvEFDj!beCVpz4P53M=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 5936
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:446383 sci.physics:591509 sci.physics.relativity:388967 sci.math:340365

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > > pole?"
> > > >
> > > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > > >
> > > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > > north???
> > > >
> > > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > > >
> > > > It's zero, one.
> > > >
> > > > burn your text books.
> > > >
> > > > don't follow the water..
> > > > follow the 0,1
> > >
> > > Like for example...
> > >
> > > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > > upload it to your computer..
> > > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> > >
> > > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> > >
> > > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> > >
> > > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> > >
> > > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > >
> > > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > > Negative is on their left side.
> > >
> > > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > >
> > > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> > >
> > > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> >
> > Look, it's very simple..
> > in order to prove
> > we are living in a
> > computer simulation
> > you first have to
> > describe people
> > in
> > mathematical terms.
> >
> > Nature's math is simple.
> >
> > zero, one
> >
> > I will soon show you
> > a mathematical model
> > of people in 0,1
> > using photograph illustration.
> >
> > It is indisputable.
> 
> Not only do you have to
> show the mathematical model, but
> also the language needs to be
> converted so that others
> can understand in which they
> are more fimilar with.
> 
> For example:
> 
> 0,1
> zero, one
> negative, positive
> Left, Right
> etc, etc..
> 
> Now, before I explain
> How a person is divided
> in half from head to toe,
> left, right
> 0, 1
> 
> I'll start from
> what you're most
> familiar with...
> 
> or, the 'scientific community'
> incomplete findings:
> 
> http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> 
> The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
> but not the whole rest of the body.
> 
> http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> 
> I have to fill in their missing parts..
> 
> I will provide the missing parts soon,
> but first before I do..you need to be
> more familiar with what is already known.
> 
> http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg
> 
> I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
> right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.
> 
> But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
> not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
> I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
> living in a computer simulated universe,
> so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.
> 
> You people are to close to the trees to see the
> computer...



"A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face. 
A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."




Left - false smile

right - genuine smile


left =  0
right = 1

left = minus
right - plus

left = negative
right = positive

Left - false smile

right - genuine smile

left = bad
right = good

left =  zero
right = one

> > in order to prove
> > we are living in a
> > computer simulation
> > you first have to
> > describe people
> > in
> > mathematical terms.
> >
> > zero, one

to be continued...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-26 00:36 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-27 16:43 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 10:23 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web