Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #594935

Re: The Next Game

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > > > > > > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > > > > > > > pole?"
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > > > > > > > north???
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's zero, one.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > burn your text books.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > don't follow the water..
> > > > > > > > > follow the 0,1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Like for example...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > > > > > > > upload it to your computer..
> > > > > > > > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > > > > > > > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > > > > > > > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > > > > > > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > > > > > > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > > > > > > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > > > > > > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > > > > > > > Negative is on their left side.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > > > > > > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > > > > > > > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > > > > > > > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Look, it's very simple..
> > > > > > > in order to prove
> > > > > > > we are living in a
> > > > > > > computer simulation
> > > > > > > you first have to
> > > > > > > describe people
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > mathematical terms.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nature's math is simple.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > zero, one
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will soon show you
> > > > > > > a mathematical model
> > > > > > > of people in 0,1
> > > > > > > using photograph illustration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is indisputable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not only do you have to
> > > > > > show the mathematical model, but
> > > > > > also the language needs to be
> > > > > > converted so that others
> > > > > > can understand in which they
> > > > > > are more fimilar with.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 0,1
> > > > > > zero, one
> > > > > > negative, positive
> > > > > > Left, Right
> > > > > > etc, etc..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, before I explain
> > > > > > How a person is divided
> > > > > > in half from head to toe,
> > > > > > left, right
> > > > > > 0, 1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll start from
> > > > > > what you're most
> > > > > > familiar with...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > or, the 'scientific community'
> > > > > > incomplete findings:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
> > > > > > but not the whole rest of the body.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have to fill in their missing parts..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will provide the missing parts soon,
> > > > > > but first before I do..you need to be
> > > > > > more familiar with what is already known.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
> > > > > > right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
> > > > > > not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
> > > > > > I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
> > > > > > living in a computer simulated universe,
> > > > > > so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You people are to close to the trees to see the
> > > > > > computer...
> > > > >
> > > > > "A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face.
> > > > > A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."
> > > > >
> > > > > Left - false smile
> > > > >
> > > > > right - genuine smile
> > > > >
> > > > > left =  0
> > > > > right = 1
> > > > >
> > > > > left = minus
> > > > > right - plus
> > > > >
> > > > > left = negative
> > > > > right = positive
> > > > >
> > > > > Left - false smile
> > > > >
> > > > > right - genuine smile
> > > > >
> > > > > left = bad
> > > > > right = good
> > > > >
> > > > > left =  zero
> > > > > right = one
> > > > >
> > > > > > > in order to prove
> > > > > > > we are living in a
> > > > > > > computer simulation
> > > > > > > you first have to
> > > > > > > describe people
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > mathematical terms.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > zero, one
> > > > >
> > > > > to be continued...
> > > >
> > > > i have to provide you first with parts of
> > > > the picture otherwise if i show you the whole picture...you will
> > > > just get overwhelmed.
> > > >
> > > > It's like a blind man
> > > > regaining his sight
> > > > for the first time and
> > > >  seeing stairs ...
> > > > he does not know what the stairs are.
> > > >
> > > > He gets disoriented by his surroundings.
> > > >
> > > > I don't want you to get
> > > > disoriented by your surroundings
> > > > when you realize you're living in a
> > > > computer simulation universe.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
> > >
> > > After a while a 'pattern' begins to emerge...
> > >
> > > > > "A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face.
> > > > > A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."
> > >
> > > The left seems to have a pattern of....being negative, zero, left=bad, 0, minus...
> > >
> > > "I've got two left feet."
> > >
> > > In order for me to demostrate that you're a computer simulation,
> > > I first have to make sure you're familar with...zero, one.
> > >
> > > Every person you see on earth is in fact an...optical illusion.
> > >
> > > If you don't separate the left from the right...you're just going to see
> > > an optical illusion. The left and the right meld to form the illusion.
> > >
> > > I will remove the illusion.
> > >
> > > to be continued...
> > >
> >
> > to be continued...
> 
> I can see that every person on earth is
> an optical illusion...
> I'm still looking for an optical illusion
> illustration similiar to people...
> 
> The optical illusion begins or
> ends right at the middle..
> between the right and left..
> the one and zero..
> 0,1
> 
> The number or numbers
> that exist between the
> one and zero
> is...
> the numbers that
> make the consciousness exist.
> 
> In other words...
> if you want machines to Think
> for themselves..you need to program
> the 'numbers' inbetween 0 and 1.
> 
> I don't think you guys are there yet..
> 
> or even know what the numbers are between
> one and zero.
> 
> It is the numbers between one and zero
> that lies inbetween that is the algorithm
> of the universe, and creates...awareness.
> 
> Those numbers, between 0,1
> is what creates..a simple flower,
> 
> or an entire universe.
> 
> Now, you can easily draw
> a line dividing the entire
> person.
> 
> The line is there..
> you just need to connect
> the lines.
> 
> If you look at
> your girlfrinds behind..
> you'll see a line..
> and then it appears to
> blend away...but it's the middle.
> 
> Or there is a line in the middle...
> the space of your two front teeth.
> 
> It divides the left from the right..
> right at the middle..
> 
> The middle line between the left
> and right brain is where the
> awareness/consciousness
> 
> between the zero and the one.
> 
> Soon I will demonstrate that
> people are in fact..
> computer simulations.
> 
> I'm just giving you the numbers first...


The simpliest numbers I can give you is..
on the Left hand you have five fingers,
and on the Right hand you have five fingers...

Now, you add 5 plus 5 you get = one zero, or zero one
depending which way you counted.

1,0
0,1

the toes come out to 1,0.


Getting back to the middle...
the line in front of your girlfriend..
in the middle...
(go ahead, take a look, I'll wait...)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-26 00:36 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-27 16:43 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 10:23 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web