Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591016

Re: The Next Game

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > > > > enough computer power
> > > > > > > for another Earth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you understand...
> > > > > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > then you'll understand
> > > > > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > > > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > > > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> > > > >
> > > > >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > > > > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > > > > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > > > > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > > > > world?
> > > >
> > > > http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> > > >
> > > > of course these people (links) are from the past...
> > > >
> > > > i'm the future
> > > >
> > > > i take it to a whole new level.
> > >
> > > What most people don't understand is that
> > > Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.
> >
> > To end this simulation-argument...
> >
> > I have proof that the universe and the earth
> > is a computer simulation...the evidence is overwhelming.
> >
> > For example...our Moon (a computable 0-1 particle)..
> > if the dark side of the moon was facing the earth...it wouldn't
> > rain..there would be no ocean.
> 
> The question "Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?" has been answered. The answer is Yes.
> 
> I have answered it. I got the proof. It is...Indisputable.
> 
> But now, ...I have to make some simple changes in the math world.
> 
> Magnetic north and magnetic south need to be changed to: Mn=1 and Ms=0.
> 
> For example: Our moon facing us is 1, and the dark side is 0.
> 
> That's it.


In other words...when the question is asked:
Why do we only see one side of the moon? or
Why does the same side of the moon always face Earth?

Why is the same portion of the Moon's sphere is always facing the Earth?

The answer always given is wrong....until now.


Why do we only see one side of the moon? Answer: It's the positive side, the 1, the magnetic north of the moon.

The tides on the earth change according to the magneitc pull of the moon. 

It pushes and pulls...1 and 1 , zero and 1. 

It pushes and pulls..earth=1 and moon=1, earth=0 and moon=1.


The moon always remains...1.

The earth changes from 1 to 0

It attracts and repells.


Now, I should move to  people's
one and zero.

> People are computer simulations living
> in a computer simulated universe, and they
> are computational. The One is on your Right,
> and the Zero is on your Left side.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-26 00:36 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-27 16:43 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 10:23 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web