Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #590587

Re: The Next Game

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:39:37 -0500
Message-ID <57950B94.2EA4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:40:20 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: The Next Game
References <5791C9A2.6FE6@ix.netcom.com> <579321CF.320D@ix.netcom.com> <5793252C.3514@ix.netcom.com> <5793E334.71BB@ix.netcom.com> <579409F8.4049@ix.netcom.com> <57950967.CFA@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 84
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-6v3M2l/XdrpdyyXSIopROiaNe59Kr5Jl6Le9ew8E2ge7nHn+6yTlStFu91uY2HH98Ft6gT01rSnIjKi!HHvsq7fJGFOblZHJuwvhcStw9AyhnDKmy8C5UmdCbPjNay5K3cIYFuJrBk6CTKHUtDlKJllVYq3b!wpWCN3bgYH0=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 3787
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:445579 sci.physics:590587 sci.physics.relativity:388286 alt.astronomy:285756

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


https://www.fat.bme.hu/student/pub/Programozas3/SimulationArgument.pdf



Nasa doesn't want to bring up the SimulationArgument because it will 
throw their whole 'search for water' industry out-of-business.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > >
> > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > running the universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > computer errors.
> > > >
> > > > To put it simply..
> > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > >
> > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > >
> > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> >
> > There simply isn't...
> > enough computer power
> > for another Earth.
> >
> > If you understand...
> > how much computer power it takes,
> > to create the heavens and the earth..
> >
> > then you'll understand
> > why there can only be one earth.
> 
> "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-26 00:36 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-27 16:43 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 10:23 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web