Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #589909

Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 19 Jul 2016 03:26:12 -0500
Message-ID <578DE44D.11B6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:26:53 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
References <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <578DB36C.7381@ix.netcom.com> <800b4040-588c-48d0-a88f-9f452752aa2f@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 25
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-msDwbjB/4Aj76Fio0uaK+ZQiIRPu80aCHOvPar3dr8YI8D0eRNFJdOOuvUYOKe3zYStDmEY2H+XRksk!FTTOEySjMcuU9ftKC2OCXmxkni5Te9rY/KRzu5vIkAA0+XYUXsyUdoA5GKrbfr3z3oRqKWVI7uK3!WArxJC1w3rc=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1899
X-Received-Bytes 1990
X-Received-Body-CRC 2805378852
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:589909

Show key headers only | View raw


mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> >
> >
> > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or
> > set in motion.
> >
> > a particle is...aware.
> 
> I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap.
> 
> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...


to me
you're just a
chemical scum 
on the surface of
the earth.

You like that?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
          Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400

csiph-web