Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #581539

Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 29 May 2016 14:11:34 -0500
Message-ID <574B3EEA.2642@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sun, 29 May 2016 12:11:38 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics
References <8d921732-611c-4b89-9b4a-b47ac10600b0@googlegroups.com> <574B354C.616E@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 51
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-GvlLRrzs5Y25qPszXjm/zvHC9KBp0UTq3PLiZmr9rqYzWwrBimkCprBVzKQFzQpX4nsHeP/pPjnIDfX!5j0agtBvShFiH8Ds7izB91VWF0TsmyBIVzPxHi/7cQ86DyNcmZyzR6Oi5bl4mKuCTRX2R4lCx8le!32CbyIJ1bq0=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 3545
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:440863 sci.physics:581539 sci.physics.relativity:384569 alt.astronomy:285015

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
> >
> > Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate has two aspects:
> >
> > 1. Any light moving in a vacuum has the same constant speed, c = 299,792 kilometers per second, as measured by any observer.
> >
> > 2. If the observer were to hurry towards the light source (his speed changes), he would again measure the same constant speed, c = 299,792 kilometers per second.
> >
> > The first aspect has been disproved - the speed of light travelling in a vacuum is not a constant:
> >
> > http://phys.org/news/2016-03-optical-slower.html
> >
> >
> > http://rt.com/news/225879-light-speed-slow-photons/
> >  "Physicists manage to slow down light inside vacuum (...) ...even now the light is no longer in the mask, it's just the propagating in free space - the speed is still slow. (...) "This finding shows unambiguously that the propagation of light can be slowed below the commonly accepted figure of 299,792,458 metres per second, even when travelling in air or vacuum," co-author Romero explains in the University of Glasgow press release."
> >
> > http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2015/01/23/Scientists-slow-down-light-particles/1191422035480
> >  "The speed of light is a limit, not a constant - that's what researchers in Glasgow, Scotland, say. A group of them just proved that light can be slowed down, permanently."
> >
> > http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/417655/scitech/science/exclusive-this-pinay-physicist-can-slow-down-light-without-touching-it
> >  "Although the maximum speed of light is a cosmological constant - made famous by Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and E=mc^2 - it can, in fact, be slowed down: that's what optics do."
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxJ7_tbbIsg
> >  "Glasgow researchers slow the speed of light"
> >
> > The second aspect is even easier to disprove - I will do this in my next posting.
> >
> > Pentcho Valev
> 
> I don't understand what the issue is here...
> So Albert Einstein lied about the speed of light, so what? He
> was just changing the facts to fit his theory...how else do
> you have a perfect theory???


To put it simply that anyone can understand....


If you can go faster than the speed of sound...
you can go faster than the speed of light.

And that's that!

End of story.

Not up for discussion.


It's irrefutable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 11:30 -0700
  Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 12:11 -0700
    Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 12:13 -0700
      Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 20:35 +0300
        Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 19:53 +0200
          Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 21:10 +0300
            Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 21:02 +0200
              Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 22:32 +0300
                Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 21:58 +0200

csiph-web