Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #440861

Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Pentcho Valev wrote:
> 
> Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate has two aspects:
> 
> 1. Any light moving in a vacuum has the same constant speed, c = 299,792 kilometers per second, as measured by any observer.
> 
> 2. If the observer were to hurry towards the light source (his speed changes), he would again measure the same constant speed, c = 299,792 kilometers per second.
> 
> The first aspect has been disproved - the speed of light travelling in a vacuum is not a constant:
> 
> http://phys.org/news/2016-03-optical-slower.html
> 
> 
> http://rt.com/news/225879-light-speed-slow-photons/
>  "Physicists manage to slow down light inside vacuum (...) ...even now the light is no longer in the mask, it's just the propagating in free space - the speed is still slow. (...) "This finding shows unambiguously that the propagation of light can be slowed below the commonly accepted figure of 299,792,458 metres per second, even when travelling in air or vacuum," co-author Romero explains in the University of Glasgow press release."
> 
> http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2015/01/23/Scientists-slow-down-light-particles/1191422035480
>  "The speed of light is a limit, not a constant - that's what researchers in Glasgow, Scotland, say. A group of them just proved that light can be slowed down, permanently."
> 
> http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/417655/scitech/science/exclusive-this-pinay-physicist-can-slow-down-light-without-touching-it
>  "Although the maximum speed of light is a cosmological constant - made famous by Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and E=mc^2 - it can, in fact, be slowed down: that's what optics do."
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxJ7_tbbIsg
>  "Glasgow researchers slow the speed of light"
> 
> The second aspect is even easier to disprove - I will do this in my next posting.
> 
> Pentcho Valev


I don't understand what the issue is here...
So Albert Einstein lied about the speed of light, so what? He
was just changing the facts to fit his theory...how else do
you have a perfect theory???

So he lied in his letter to Roosevelt that the Germans were building an atomic bomb..
he had to lie to get his hands on the Uranium he needed to build his own atomic bomb.


just changing the facts to fit his theory...how else do
you get tons of Uranium???


Of course, Roosevelt thought "Why would we want to kill the Germans, they are doing such a good job killing Jewish people!".

The President said, "I'm going to send IBM over there to help them."


IBM Hollerith computers ...make them Holler...Holler-caust computers.

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 11:30 -0700
  Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 12:11 -0700
    Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-29 12:13 -0700
      Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 20:35 +0300
        Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 19:53 +0200
          Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 21:10 +0300
            Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 21:02 +0200
              Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 22:32 +0300
                Re: Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 21:58 +0200

csiph-web