Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #574369

Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment
Date Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:00:05 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 10
Message-ID <5724BA65.9080503@comcast.net> (permalink)
References <571FC38D.2000701@comcast.net> <45079ff3-6166-4fd1-8976-27150b5a1030@googlegroups.com> <57236D49.40902@comcast.net> <c1c5738b-2764-4524-bbb6-6eddbbb0c1b7@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="da68791b8f3d5bf8a07b4a367ed7ac75"; logging-data="6392"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18htfnh7hF5FScK3LnagenE"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
In-Reply-To <c1c5738b-2764-4524-bbb6-6eddbbb0c1b7@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:l/nquXEoSbtLbK2VYu87Sk0Ym14=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:574369

Show key headers only | View raw


On 4/29/16 10:26 PM, Timo wrote:
>
> But that's all beside the point. You made an incorrect statement about
>Schroedinger's beliefs, which is contradicted by what Schroedinger wrote.
>For some stuff about what Schroedinger's ideas:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.09.007
>


Thanks for those links.  I'll take a look.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-04-26 13:37 -0600
  Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:18 -0700
    Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-04-27 07:38 -0600
    Re: The milk was obviously spoiled (or not) for some time. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-01 13:58 -0700
  Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-04-27 07:28 -0600
  Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:48 -0500
    Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 16:56 -0400
  Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-04-28 14:31 -0700
    Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-04-29 08:18 -0600
      Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-04-29 21:26 -0700
        Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-04-30 08:00 -0600
  Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 12:56 -0700
    Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 13:02 -0700
    Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-29 13:59 -0700
      Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 14:27 -0700
        Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 18:30 -0700
        Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-01 14:03 -0700

csiph-web