Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Improved Schrodinger's Cat Experiment
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:00:05 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <5724BA65.9080503@comcast.net>
References: <571FC38D.2000701@comcast.net> <45079ff3-6166-4fd1-8976-27150b5a1030@googlegroups.com> <57236D49.40902@comcast.net> <c1c5738b-2764-4524-bbb6-6eddbbb0c1b7@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="da68791b8f3d5bf8a07b4a367ed7ac75"; logging-data="6392"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18htfnh7hF5FScK3LnagenE"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
In-Reply-To: <c1c5738b-2764-4524-bbb6-6eddbbb0c1b7@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l/nquXEoSbtLbK2VYu87Sk0Ym14=
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:574369

On 4/29/16 10:26 PM, Timo wrote:
>
> But that's all beside the point. You made an incorrect statement about
>Schroedinger's beliefs, which is contradicted by what Schroedinger wrote.
>For some stuff about what Schroedinger's ideas:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.09.007
>


Thanks for those links.  I'll take a look.