Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #583889
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure |
| Date | Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:27:01 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 36 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <558m2d-ccd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <62d14089-98a3-461b-aa56-7fd9b3a38007@googlegroups.com> <raec2d-7ha.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <781709e4-9879-409b-9886-98b38e7b33df@googlegroups.com> <sh4e2d-46g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <77a90204-7fa8-4b35-aa44-5ab5b4c592d8@googlegroups.com> <hane2d-41i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <9d661b2c-d326-4275-8858-092462867c46@googlegroups.com> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="24965"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18thVTPD9+Dv8sPyvv2smUT" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:zc9Nv008n/LDa68SvikiruEhvUs= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:583889 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote: >> >> >> > From a distance all you would see is the inflatable blimp like prop. >> >> >> >> >> >> > It would have no significant battery for overnight power. Instead during the day it would power toward the earth like an upside down helicopter to retard the gain in altitude as the He expanded. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > When it cooled at night the prop would auto rotate down to the lower altitude limit. >> > >> >> >> > To eliminate the huge torque from a counter rotating prop the major vertical axis prop is powered by smaller tip mounted props like a pin wheel. >> > >> >> >> > The Reynolds number would be yuge! >> > >> >> >> > Bret Cahill >> > >> >> >> Why do soap bubbles and cannon balls have identical Reynold's numbers >> > >> >> > Why do nut jobs think they have the same Reynolds numbers? >> >> >> >> Why do kooks not understand that Reynolds number is determined by geometry >> >> and a sphere is a sphere? >> > >> > Lunatics think soap bubbles are the same size and drop the same speed as >> > cannon balls? >> >> There is no reason you can not have identically sized soap bubbles and >> cannon balls. > > The issue is balloons the size of football stadiums. As Reynolds number is determined by geometry, absolute size is irrelevant. A piece of #11 shotgun shot (diamenter 0.06 inches) has the same Reynolds number as a 200 yard diamenter round balloon. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 12:47 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 02:11 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 22:22 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 17:36 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 13:52 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 22:56 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 00:57 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-08 19:27 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 19:16 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 02:52 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 06:55 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 16:22 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 13:23 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 21:14 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 14:49 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-09 19:46 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 05:53 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 10:07 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 17:49 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:22 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 19:40 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-11 05:00 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-11 01:13 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-11 17:38 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 00:58 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 07:23 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 14:18 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-08 16:26 -0500
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-08 21:41 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 20:23 -0400
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 00:34 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 21:07 -0400
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-08 19:22 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 02:36 +0000
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 14:42 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-09 20:20 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 10:10 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-11 11:02 -0700
Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 20:11 -0700
csiph-web