Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure
Date	2016-06-09 21:14 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mq2p2d-jvm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <f15c3d32-96fe-46d0-a2d3-73a5b1fe6858@googlegroups.com> <p82n2d-s2g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <f6e6573c-8bfb-4261-8e26-49fb36e6a60b@googlegroups.com> <bmho2d-g3l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <453542ae-cd8c-4447-83b0-58655471c044@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 12:31:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:01:11 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 3:31:12 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >> Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > From a distance all you would see is the inflatable blimp like prop.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It would have no significant battery for overnight
>> >> >> >> >> >> > power.  Instead during the day it would power toward
>> >> >> >> >> >> > the earth like an upside down helicopter to retard the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > gain in altitude as the He expanded.
>> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > When it cooled at night the prop would auto rotate
>> >> >> >> > down to the lower altitude limit.
>> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > To eliminate the huge torque from a counter rotating
>> >> >> >> > prop the major vertical axis prop is powered by smaller tip
>> >> >> >> > mounted props like a pin wheel.
>> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The Reynolds number would be yuge!
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Bret Cahill
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Why do soap bubbles and cannon balls have identical Reynold's numbers
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Why do nut jobs think they have the same Reynolds numbers?
>> >> >> >> >>  
>> >> >> >> >> Why do kooks not understand that Reynolds number is determined by geometry
>> >> >> >> >> and a sphere is a sphere?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Lunatics think soap bubbles are the same size and drop the same speed as
>> >> >> >> > cannon balls?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> There is no reason you can not have identically sized soap bubbles and
>> >> >> >> cannon balls.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > The issue is balloons the size of football stadiums.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> As Reynolds number is determined by geometry, absolute size is irrelevant.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> A piece of #11 shotgun shot (diamenter 0.06 inches) has the same
>> >> >> Reynolds number as a 200 yard diamenter round balloon.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> -- 
>> >> >> Jim Pennino
>> >> > 
>> >> > Sir JimJi, you are mistaken. Or you just misremember. Breathe. Slow down.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Reynolds Number is far more complicated than mere geometry. 
>> >> 
>> >> Then why is the Reynolds number of any sphere, of any size, and of any
>> >> material always the same number?
>> > 
>> > One must take into account more than mere shape/geometry.
>> 
>> Then why is the Reynolds number of any sphere, of any size, and of any
>> material always the same number? 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Sir JimJi, please repost your actual response. Mistakes do happen...
> 
> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”  

For the third time, why is the Reynolds number of any sphere, of any size,
and of any material always the same number?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 12:47 -0700
  Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 02:11 +0000
    Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 22:22 -0700
      Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 17:36 +0000
        Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 13:52 -0700
          Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 22:56 +0000
            Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 00:57 -0700
              Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-08 19:27 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 19:16 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 02:52 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 06:55 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 16:22 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 13:23 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 21:14 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 14:49 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-09 19:46 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 05:53 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 10:07 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 17:49 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:22 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 19:40 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-11 05:00 +0000
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-11 01:13 -0700
                Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-11 17:38 +0000
  Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 00:58 -0700
    Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 07:23 -0700
    Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 14:18 -0700
      Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-08 16:26 -0500
      Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-08 21:41 +0000
        Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 20:23 -0400
          Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 00:34 +0000
            Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 21:07 -0400
              Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-08 19:22 -0700
              Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 02:36 +0000
  Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-08 14:42 -0700
    Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-09 20:20 -0700
      Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 10:10 -0700
        Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-11 11:02 -0700
      Re: PV Dirigible Prop Alternative To Super Pressure Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-06-10 20:11 -0700

csiph-web