Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #498482

Re: Stars

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 07 Jun 2015 14:40:28 -0500
Message-ID <55749E2A.4BC1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sun, 07 Jun 2015 12:40:26 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: Stars
References <5571FB38.7032@ix.netcom.com> <mkt1q9$l8k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mktb1q$nl5$1@dont-email.me> <5572949E.4109@ix.netcom.com> <55734AE0.158F@ix.netcom.com> <5573EEEC.6122@ix.netcom.com> <9rCdnULNYdus1OnInZ2dnUU7-KUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 55
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 23.241.144.149
X-Trace sv3-Ccnstz6u9nrjJ+Hv6UxJeDwEmvC0RVN67tOY3dX6asA5g56PfSS/d/Hk5K9Ml/1TUAsSfFTd88dhf/Y!wfBnA/P9VZI7mlDVeAxEbgWCaJbYKPF9NZz6jheNkFZ1TW9QXpPTx99POaMzBYuhseok5s1w0fcf!9hLuBCVI9l0=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 3373
Xref aioe.org sci.physics:498482 sci.physics.relativity:352177 rec.arts.sf.written:413046 alt.astronomy:269701

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 6/7/15 2:12 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > also some stars are ...reborn. They become bigger stars.
> 
>    This is observed in globular clusters--main sequence star mergers.

Well, my sources of information doesn't come from the internet or any media on earth...


I can take it a step further...a level..higher..but your sources of information has it's limits...
so you won't find it here on earth..

The stars, our sun...is 'aware' of the earth. In other words, the sun has ...consciousness.


All stars contain...consciousness.


The Starmaker


but maybe i should keep the subject of stars at a level of your understanding...like google links.





> 
>    Blue straggler
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_straggler
> 
> > Blue stragglers (BSS) are main-sequence stars in open or globular
> > clusters that are more luminous and bluer than stars at the
> > main-sequence turn-off point for the cluster. Blue stragglers were
> > first discovered by Allan Sandage in 1953 while performing photometry
> > of the stars in the globular cluster M3.[2][3] Standard theories of
> > stellar evolution hold that the position of a star on the
> > Hertzsprung–Russell diagram should be determined almost entirely by
> > the initial mass of the star and its age. In a cluster, stars all
> > formed at approximately the same time, and thus in an H–R diagram for
> > a cluster, all stars should lie along a clearly defined curve set by
> > the age of the cluster, with the positions of individual stars on
> > that curve determined solely by their initial mass. With masses two
> > to three times that of the rest of the main-sequence cluster stars,
> > blue stragglers seem to be exceptions to this rule.[4] The resolution
> > of this problem is likely related to interactions between two or more
> > stars in the dense confines of the clusters in which blue stragglers
> > are found.
> 
> --
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
> of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
> social issues.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 12:40 -0700
  Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:50 -0500
  Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 15:45 -0500
    Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 14:22 -0700
      Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:52 -0400
        Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 16:54 -0500
        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 15:41 -0700
        Re: Stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 18:52 -0400
    Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:47 -0400
    Re: Stars Forehead <head@4the.hills> - 2015-06-05 18:24 -0500
      Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 23:35 -0700
        Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-06 04:12 -0400
        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 12:32 -0700
          Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 15:04 -0500
          Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 00:12 -0700
            Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 08:37 -0500
              Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 12:40 -0700
                Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 20:33 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 18:43 -0700
                Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-07 20:58 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:48 -0700
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:55 -0700
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:56 -0700
                Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-08 21:54 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 18:14 -0700

csiph-web