Re: Stars

Message-ID	<5573EEEC.6122@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-06-07 00:12 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: Stars
References	<5571FB38.7032@ix.netcom.com> <mkt1q9$l8k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mktb1q$nl5$1@dont-email.me> <5572949E.4109@ix.netcom.com> <55734AE0.158F@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Forehead wrote:
> > >
> > >   On 6/5/2015 2:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >   Do you see my handle? It reads 'The Starmaker'.
> > >
> > >   It means...
> > >   when it comes to ...stars, i'm an expert.
> > >   You're been told many times
> > >   that Stars explode.
> > >   Stars do not explode.
> > > When a star runs out of fuel..
> > > it does not explode.
> > >
> > >   The Starmaker
> > >
> > > Stars do not explode? That's a new one on me.
> > > I guess Supernovas are just an illusion.
> > > http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/what-is-a-supernova.html
> >
> > It looks like a picture of a big sun...couldn't it be an implosion?
> >
> > I notice that *most* information posted on the web from the science community usually do not contain an authors name..why is that?
> >
> > reminds me of that joke "Why do doctors wear masks?"
> >
> > and wiki is filled with anonymous authors...filled!
> 
> Let me put it this way....
> by now
> all the stars
> would
> have
> run out of fuel
> at the same time
> so..they should all
> be exploding
> at the same time..
> and the night sky
> would be white...
> but it's not.



also some stars are ...reborn. They become bigger stars.

Thread

Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 12:40 -0700
  Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:50 -0500
  Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 15:45 -0500
    Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 14:22 -0700
      Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:52 -0400
        Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-05 16:54 -0500
        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 15:41 -0700
        Re: Stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 18:52 -0400
    Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-05 17:47 -0400
    Re: Stars Forehead <head@4the.hills> - 2015-06-05 18:24 -0500
      Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-05 23:35 -0700
        Re: Stars "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-06-06 04:12 -0400
        Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 12:32 -0700
          Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 15:04 -0500
          Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 00:12 -0700
            Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 08:37 -0500
              Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 12:40 -0700
                Re: Stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-07 20:33 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 18:43 -0700
                Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-07 20:58 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:48 -0700
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:55 -0700
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 13:56 -0700
                Re: Stars Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-08 21:54 -0500
                Re: Stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-08 18:14 -0700

csiph-web