Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #896331
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Robin Milners fickle gives non-determinism in practice [Parallel π-WAM] (Re: Type systems for non-deterministic concurrency [Amir Pnueli]) |
| Date | 2026-07-20 12:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <113ktmc$3lig$2@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1131tbj$tqe$9@solani.org> <113ksvo$3l1m$2@solani.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hi, Hi take Robin Milners fickle: ?- emulate((between(1,2,Y),in(X),out(Y))). : 0 1 : 0 2 fail. If I use NUM=3, number of logical threads, and common input [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. I might get this common output: [1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2] Or this common output: [1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2] Or this common output: [1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2] What else? Did I miss some case? Can be seen on GPU and CPU backend, depending on launch parameters. (*) Bye (*) If logical threads are executed together in work groups, certain guarantees of determinism might hold. But modern GPUs usually support multiple independent work groups, also my CPU backend does support a notion of multiple independent work groups. So that the determinism guarantees only hold inside the work group. Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Probably blinded by some academic remoteness > from the real world, some people really believe > nonsense like the following: > > Deterministic Concurrency - Edward Lee > deterministic models as a central part of the engineering toolkit > https://icfp26.sigplan.org/track/icfp-2026-icfp-keynotes#event-overview > > But hey Aristoteles present us already with > modal logic to talk about the future. So > if I have a process calculus, with expressions > > π, that capture all my processes of interest, > I can have a modal logic of with modal operators > [π] and <π> that give necessity and possibility, > > the simplest first order bootstrapped types are: > > Product Type: > A -> [π]B > > Sum Type: > A /\ <π>B > > So we need more than only a ->π type? But even > with two types, is there an easy equivalent of > Curry Howard isomorphism? > > In contrast Amir Pnueli's 1977 system of temporal > logic, another variant of modal logic sharing many > common features with dynamic logic, differs from all > of the above-mentioned logics by being what Pnueli > has characterized as an "endogenous" logic, > the others being "exogenous" logics. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_logic_%28modal_logic%29 > > The Sea Battle and the Master Argument > Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future > https://www.degruyterbrill.com/de/document/doi/10.1515/9783110866346/html > > > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> For marketing purposes people >> typically look at the race towards >> 2nm, and we find: >> >> A month ago, Apple lost its exclusivity >> on 3 nm smartphone processors with >> MediaTek’s Dimensity 9400 chip, integrated >> in the Vivo X200 Pro smartphone. Qualcomm >> is also in the race with its recently >> unveiled Snapdragon 8 Elite and set to >> power the Xiaomi 15 Pro in 2025. However, >> Apple should regain its position as innovation >> leader in 2026 with the release of the >> iPhone 18, which should feature the A20 >> chip built on TSMC’s 2 nm process." >> >> But there is a vertical vias revolution >> going on as well, some SOCs typically >> being at 18 layers now: >> >> Zooming Into a CPU (It's Incredible) >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bez-2cvYja0 >> >> imec has coined the term CMOS 2.0: >> >> LEUVEN (Belgium), MARCH 12th, 2026 — Imec, >> a world-leading research and innovation hub >> in advanced semiconductor technologies, has >> launched a first-of-its-kind consortium with >> 26 European university groups that will jointly >> work on the technology roadmap beyond >> CMOS scaling (CMOS 2.0). >> https://www.imec-int.com/en/press/imec-launches-university-consortium-around-next-generation-chips >> >> >> So we might see more mobile grade GPUs. >> >> Bye >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Type systems for non-deterministic concurrency [Amir Pnueli] (Re: Creating a "European CMOS 2.0 Army") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-20 12:23 +0200 Robin Milners fickle gives non-determinism in practice [Parallel π-WAM] (Re: Type systems for non-deterministic concurrency [Amir Pnueli]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-20 12:35 +0200
csiph-web