Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #402911 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-24 19:02 +1100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-30 08:16 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 390 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-24 19:02 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 01:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 01:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:39 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 14:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 18:29 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 01:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:23 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 12:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:08 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 13:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-12-27 11:08 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 05:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:22 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 12:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-24 22:38 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:11 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-24 06:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:16 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-25 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:25 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-25 10:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:12 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-25 19:21 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-26 03:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:26 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-26 09:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:28 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-28 09:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-29 11:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-29 14:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:23 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-30 11:52 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-31 07:31 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Eckard B <eckard.blumschein@arcor.de> - 2017-01-04 03:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-05 08:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 16:35 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:19 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 18:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 15:38 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-24 16:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-24 20:33 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 18:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 08:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 04:59 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 00:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:46 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 19:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 18:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-28 16:54 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 02:43 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:06 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:26 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-30 01:06 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 14:28 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 07:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 07:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 09:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 15:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-28 11:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 15:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:01 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 14:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:19 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-12-28 22:26 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 07:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:27 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 10:52 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 03:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-31 07:34 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 14:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-30 14:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 06:27 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 01:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-02 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-03 13:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 18:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-04 03:52 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-04 10:45 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-05 08:22 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-05 11:19 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 08:54 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 14:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 15:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 03:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-07 05:44 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 14:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 15:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 15:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 17:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 21:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 22:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 02:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 04:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 05:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 08:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 09:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 09:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 16:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 16:33 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 17:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 17:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 19:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 00:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 07:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 01:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 07:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 18:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 18:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 08:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 08:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 17:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 19:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 00:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-10 00:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-10 07:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 07:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-10 08:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-09 10:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 13:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 15:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 15:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 16:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 16:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:59 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 18:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 18:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 20:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 22:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 00:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 20:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 20:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 21:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-11 18:26 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 19:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-11 19:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 01:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 06:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 09:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 09:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 09:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 07:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 08:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 08:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 09:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 10:13 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 11:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 12:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 12:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 12:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 13:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 15:11 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 15:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 15:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 01:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 17:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 02:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 07:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 15:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 09:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 18:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 18:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 18:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 20:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 20:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 21:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 10:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-15 18:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 22:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 19:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 20:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-16 22:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 07:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 08:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 08:54 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 09:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 09:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 11:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 11:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 12:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 13:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 14:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 14:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 15:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 17:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 18:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 18:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 17:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 17:52 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 18:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 19:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 20:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 04:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 05:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 11:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 11:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 12:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 15:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 16:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 17:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 18:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 01:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 21:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 22:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 22:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 23:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 18:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 19:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 20:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 22:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 22:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 01:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 01:59 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 09:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 09:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 10:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 11:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 11:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 12:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 13:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 15:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 16:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 12:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 20:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 20:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 22:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 13:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 15:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 16:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 16:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 18:13 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 19:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 20:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 20:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 22:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 22:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 23:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 02:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 08:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 08:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 08:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 08:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 09:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 10:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 15:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 22:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 23:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 08:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 10:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 11:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 11:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 11:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 15:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 15:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 15:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 17:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 17:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 18:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 18:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 19:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 19:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 20:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 22:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 23:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 05:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 07:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 12:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 16:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 17:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 18:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 20:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 22:17 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 22:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 17:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-24 19:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 21:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-25 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-25 09:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 10:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 10:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 10:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 11:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 12:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 01:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-26 02:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-26 15:39 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-01-27 20:33 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-24 22:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 13:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 13:54 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 14:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 16:17 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-23 14:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-24 13:25 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 01:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-12 01:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-22 14:42 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 15:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 08:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 05:17 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-07 11:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-08 10:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 17:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-08 15:42 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-08 05:51 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-09 04:56 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-08 19:31 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-09 08:06 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 17:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-04 09:21 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-01 13:00 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 12:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:16 +1100
Page 4 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 20 Next page →
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 01:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o44bua$n4m$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #403404 |
HGW <hw@....> writes: >On 30/12/16 09:25, Michael Moroney wrote: >> HGW <hw@....> writes: >> >>> On 29/12/16 13:43, Michael Moron- admitted he knows nothing about >>> science and that is why he never mentions it. >> >> HGW, I see you really are pissed at the fact I called you out for >> first wondering whether the Sagnac timing difference test could be >> "and possibly has been done", but then, somehow, you, HGW, just knew >> the answer, "no significant difference" was detected! HGW, tell us, >> how you knew that as an experimental result if you didn't even know >> whether the actual test had even been done? HGW, can you do that >> again? What are the numbers that will be drawn for tomorrow's >> lottery, HGW? Or tell me which stock will be the biggest gainer for >> all of 2017, HGW? >Hey shithead, tell me how you would send a two GPS signals around the >Earth in opposite directions. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, I asked you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) how you knew the answer to an observation that you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) had no idea if it had ever been done, Ralph. Ralph Rabbidge, if you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) know the answers to things like that, Ralph, it must mean that you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) must be able to predict the future, Ralph, since you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) apparently know the answers to experiments once they are eventually performed, Ralph. So Ralph, please give me the winning numbers to tomorrow's lottery drawing, Ralph. Ralph, I know that you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) know the numbers, please share them with me, Ralph Rabbidge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 14:28 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o44k83$mjv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403409 |
On 30/12/16 12:06, Micky Moron admitted he didn't know how to send a GPS signal around the Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bartekltg@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-25 07:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a455c34a-9e78-4a0d-9cf6-09e9ae535069@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402911 |
W dniu sobota, 24 grudnia 2016 09:02:32 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that the two > beams of a ring gyro travel different distances. SR says both beams move > at c in the non-rotating frame and have different travel times, Bath > says the travel times are the same. SR says light is a simple oscillator > and since both rays leave together, they must reunite with different > phase. BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed > wavelength. > > SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the > difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. > Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) > > BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are > (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. > Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. > > So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same correct > answer? It took me a moment that bath is balistic/emission theory ;-) I'm lost. You said: - Bath says the travel times are the same OK, this quite obvious. - BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed wavelength. OK, many theory say that. This is more about, as someone mentioned in thread, relation between phase/group/signal velocities. But how from this two assumption you get the result? The wave front does not osculate, so both fronts have (for example) phase 0. Both signal appear in the detector in the same time, so I do not see the phase difference. Didn't Sagnac experiment one of the experiments disproving (ale least simpler version) emission theory? bartekltg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 07:53 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o3pbjg$4dg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #402960 |
On 26/12/16 02:35, bartekltg@gmail.com wrote: >> SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the >> difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. >> Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) >> >> BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are >> (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. >> Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. >> >> So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same correct >> answer? > > It took me a moment that bath is balistic/emission theory ;-) > > I'm lost. > You said: > - Bath says the travel times are the same > OK, this quite obvious. It isn't obvious to many. > - BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed wavelength. > OK, many theory say that. No they don't. Mine is the only one. This is more about, as someone mentioned > in thread, relation between phase/group/signal velocities. ....Nothing to do with that diversionary crap. > But how from this two assumption you get the result? > The wave front does not osculate, so both fronts have (for example) > phase 0. Both signal appear in the detector in the same time, > so I do not see the phase difference. You wouldn't...because you don't have the intelligence or knowledge. When the ring is stationary, each path contains the same number of wavelengths. During an angular ACCELERATION, THE NUMBERS BECOME UNEQUAL and REMAIN unequal after the acceleration ceases. The result is that any two arriving wave elements are always out of phase if the ring is rotating at all. > Didn't Sagnac experiment one of the experiments disproving (ale least > simpler version) emission theory? That was a fallacy. People like Roberts and Andersen wrongly analyze it from the POV of the rotating frame and get their logic all wrong. In fact, Sagnac clearly disproves Einstein's silly theory. > bartekltg > --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 09:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98b92605-13e8-4a22-beda-22bdc8e034a1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402960 |
On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-6, bart...@gmail.com wrote:
> It took me a moment that bath is balistic/emission theory ;-)
>
> I'm lost.
> You said:
> - Bath says the travel times are the same
> OK, this quite obvious.
>
> - BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed wavelength.
> OK, many theory say that. This is more about, as someone mentioned
> in thread, relation between phase/group/signal velocities.
>
> But how from this two assumption you get the result?
>
> The wave front does not osculate, so both fronts have (for example)
> phase 0. Both signal appear in the detector in the same time,
> so I do not see the phase difference.
To explain the Sagnac effect, Henry proposes a theory of light propagation which
is quite unlike any rational emission theory. It is so bizarre that it requires
an animation to appreciate.
Henry summarized his Sagnac theory in a Visual Basic program, "rayphases.exe".
One should, of course, normally never execute an executable from a source as
ignorant of system security as Henry, but as a professional software developer,
I was able to execute his program in a virtual environment to obtain screen
captures. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcTmVSTUl3cGlzc2s
His animation depicts the phase changes experienced by a photon pair as they
travel in opposite directions around the Sagnac ring. It is a little misleading
because he uses sinusoidal waves to record the photons' state at different
moments during their travel around the ring, but in reality, the two photons
exist only at the leading edges of the two oppositely propagating paths.
Henry's photons oscillate as they travel. Furthermore, their rate of oscillation
depends on their state of motion when they were emitted. Although Henry denies
that frequency exists, photons emitted in a forward direction have a higher
oscillation rate than photons emitted in a rearward direction, so that the
wavelength in all directions is constant.
Although Henry denies the existence of absolute space, his model is critically
dependent on the emission point being fixed in absolute space.
This fact is much more easily appreciated if one considers the two-dimensional
spread of an infinitesimal pulse of photons from a traveling source. Imagine
a satellite orbiting around the Earth that emits a pulse of photons as it passes
over a fixed landmark (the red dot).
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE
(The gif animation works directly from Google Drive on most computers, but
I've noticed that a few old tablets have issues. If the animation does not
work for you, download the gif file and display it locally.)
The top animation is directly analogous to Henry's rayphases program, in that
it displays the photons' entire phase history. The satellite is presumed to be
traveling at 0.5 c, and one can see the symmetrical spread of light around the
satellite. However, rearwards light travels at 0.5 c relative to the emission
point, while forwards light travels at 1.5 c relative to the emission point, all
the while maintaining a constant wavelength.
The bottom animation illustrates the phase changes of the spreading ring of
photons from the infinitesimal pulse. The dependency of the phase changes on the
position in absolute space of the emission point should be evident.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 15:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5ca78c1a-9a5a-4a37-ae0a-3f3bdca20c7c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403215 |
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 1:32:27 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > You are an idiot...a really hopeless case.... If anything, the bottom > one represents the BaTh concept.... and why do you the hell does your > satellite run slap bang into the Earth? It is traveling around the > Earth, you know. Can't you program properly? Have you ever considered that if you think that the satellite is running into the Earth, that maybe you are misinterpreting the animation?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 11:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <35559a9d-8dc5-4190-9459-31d765b423b6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403215 |
W dniu środa, 28 grudnia 2016 18:47:37 UTC+1 użytkownik Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog napisał: > On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-6, bart...@gmail.com wrote: > > > It took me a moment that bath is balistic/emission theory ;-) > > > > I'm lost. > > You said: > > - Bath says the travel times are the same > > OK, this quite obvious. > > > > - BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed wavelength. > > OK, many theory say that. This is more about, as someone mentioned > > in thread, relation between phase/group/signal velocities. > > > > But how from this two assumption you get the result? > > > > The wave front does not osculate, so both fronts have (for example) > > phase 0. Both signal appear in the detector in the same time, > > so I do not see the phase difference. > > To explain the Sagnac effect, Henry proposes a theory of light propagation which > is quite unlike any rational emission theory. It is so bizarre that it requires > an animation to appreciate. > > Henry summarized his Sagnac theory in a Visual Basic program, "rayphases.exe". > One should, of course, normally never execute an executable from a source as > ignorant of system security as Henry, but as a professional software developer, > I was able to execute his program in a virtual environment to obtain screen > captures. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcTmVSTUl3cGlzc2s > > His animation depicts the phase changes experienced by a photon pair as they > travel in opposite directions around the Sagnac ring. It is a little misleading > because he uses sinusoidal waves to record the photons' state at different > moments during their travel around the ring, but in reality, the two photons > exist only at the leading edges of the two oppositely propagating paths. > > Henry's photons oscillate as they travel. Furthermore, their rate of oscillation > depends on their state of motion when they were emitted. Although Henry denies > that frequency exists, photons emitted in a forward direction have a higher > oscillation rate than photons emitted in a rearward direction, so that the > wavelength in all directions is constant. > > Although Henry denies the existence of absolute space, his model is critically > dependent on the emission point being fixed in absolute space. > > This fact is much more easily appreciated if one considers the two-dimensional > spread of an infinitesimal pulse of photons from a traveling source. Imagine > a satellite orbiting around the Earth that emits a pulse of photons as it passes > over a fixed landmark (the red dot). > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE > (The gif animation works directly from Google Drive on most computers, but > I've noticed that a few old tablets have issues. If the animation does not > work for you, download the gif file and display it locally.) > The top animation is directly analogous to Henry's rayphases program, in that > it displays the photons' entire phase history. The satellite is presumed to be > traveling at 0.5 c, and one can see the symmetrical spread of light around the > satellite. However, rearwards light travels at 0.5 c relative to the emission > point, while forwards light travels at 1.5 c relative to the emission point, all > the while maintaining a constant wavelength. > > The bottom animation illustrates the phase changes of the spreading ring of > photons from the infinitesimal pulse. The dependency of the phase changes on the > position in absolute space of the emission point should be evident. You are stupid againg. The signal time is: t = L/(c+/-v), i other case there is nothing to measure. An interference is irrelevant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 15:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65bc1b8c-04e2-4cb5-b3e0-d17eec481014@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403215 |
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 1:32:27 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > It is not bizarre, It is perfectly simple and straightforward. It is only simple and straightforward to someone who is comfortable with the complete abandonment of the principle of relativity. It doesn't bother you that in the bottom animation, light emitted from the "+" does not radiate in a perfectly symmetrical fashion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 08:01 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o43tib$1p5o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403273 |
On 29/12/16 10:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 1:32:27 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > >> It is not bizarre, It is perfectly simple and straightforward. > > It is only simple and straightforward to someone who is comfortable with the > complete abandonment of the principle of relativity. I am a true relativist. Why should I take any interest in Einstein's ridiculous version? > It doesn't bother you that in the bottom animation, light emitted from the "+" > does not radiate in a perfectly symmetrical fashion? Light radiates symmetrically in the source frame. That is what you have drawn. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 14:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <01574bb0-6d83-49fd-aa4c-905b41a96333@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403370 |
On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 3:01:03 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > On 29/12/16 10:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 1:32:27 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > > > >> It is not bizarre, It is perfectly simple and straightforward. > > > > It is only simple and straightforward to someone who is comfortable with the > > complete abandonment of the principle of relativity. > > I am a true relativist. Why should I take any interest in Einstein's > ridiculous version? > > > It doesn't bother you that in the bottom animation, light emitted from the "+" > > does not radiate in a perfectly symmetrical fashion? > > Light radiates symmetrically in the source frame. That is what you have > drawn. The flashbulb was attached to the moving "+" symbol, which in rayphases would be the beam splitter. With v = 0.5 c, the rate of phase change in the forwards direction is three times the rate of phase change in the reverse direction. This is PRECISELY the same behavior exhibited by your rayphases animation. In other words, you predict a serious violation of the principle of relativity, which has been a fundamental pillar of physics since Galileo. You cannot fall back on claiming that this violation of the principle of relativity is an artifact of rotating reference frames. Although the rayphases circle is only a few centimeters across on your computer screen, doubling its diameter predicts the same thing. Keep doubling until the diameter is the same as the Earth, and it STILL predicts that the the rate of phase change in the forwards direction is greater than the rate of phase change in the reverse direction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 11:19 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o44967$anm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403397 |
On 30/12/16 09:53, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 3:01:03 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: >> On 29/12/16 10:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: >>> On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 1:32:27 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: >>> >>>> It is not bizarre, It is perfectly simple and straightforward. >>> >>> It is only simple and straightforward to someone who is comfortable with the >>> complete abandonment of the principle of relativity. >> >> I am a true relativist. Why should I take any interest in Einstein's >> ridiculous version? >> >>> It doesn't bother you that in the bottom animation, light emitted from the "+" >>> does not radiate in a perfectly symmetrical fashion? >> >> Light radiates symmetrically in the source frame. That is what you have >> drawn. > > The flashbulb was attached to the moving "+" symbol, which in rayphases would > be the beam splitter. > > With v = 0.5 c, the rate of phase change in the forwards direction is three > times the rate of phase change in the reverse direction. > > This is PRECISELY the same behavior exhibited by your rayphases animation. That is correct. That is the rate at which waves pass a point in the non-rotating frame. That is because one ray is moving faster than the other in that frame. I can't see why you are having a problem with this. > In other words, you predict a serious violation of the principle of relativity, > which has been a fundamental pillar of physics since Galileo. No I do not. You are just hopelessly confused. You cannot get into your head the reason why he path lengths differ whenever there is rotation. Einstein violated relativity with his second postulate. > You cannot fall back on claiming that this violation of the principle of > relativity is an artifact of rotating reference frames. Although the rayphases > circle is only a few centimeters across on your computer screen, doubling its > diameter predicts the same thing. Keep doubling until the diameter is the same > as the Earth, and it STILL predicts that the the rate of phase change in the > forwards direction is greater than the rate of phase change in the reverse direction. So it should be. Waves are going passed a stationary point more quickly in one than the other. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 06:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o41406$1j4q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403215 |
On 29/12/16 04:47, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Sunday, December 25, 2016 at 9:35:51 AM UTC-6, bart...@gmail.com wrote: > >> It took me a moment that bath is balistic/emission theory ;-) >> >> I'm lost. >> You said: >> - Bath says the travel times are the same >> OK, this quite obvious. >> >> - BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed wavelength. >> OK, many theory say that. This is more about, as someone mentioned >> in thread, relation between phase/group/signal velocities. >> >> But how from this two assumption you get the result? >> >> The wave front does not osculate, so both fronts have (for example) >> phase 0. Both signal appear in the detector in the same time, >> so I do not see the phase difference. > > To explain the Sagnac effect, Henry proposes a theory of light propagation which > is quite unlike any rational emission theory. It is so bizarre that it requires > an animation to appreciate. It is not bizarre, It is perfectly simple and straightforward. The path lengths are different during rotation and they change only during an acceleration. Wavelength is the same (think 'relative to the source' if you like) in both rays. > Henry summarized his Sagnac theory in a Visual Basic program, "rayphases.exe". > One should, of course, normally never execute an executable from a source as > ignorant of system security as Henry, but as a professional software developer, > I was able to execute his program in a virtual environment to obtain screen > captures. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcTmVSTUl3cGlzc2s > > His animation depicts the phase changes experienced by a photon pair as they > travel in opposite directions around the Sagnac ring. It is a little misleading > because he uses sinusoidal waves to record the photons' state at different > moments during their travel around the ring, but in reality, the two photons > exist only at the leading edges of the two oppositely propagating paths. > > Henry's photons oscillate as they travel. Furthermore, their rate of oscillation > depends on their state of motion when they were emitted. Although Henry denies > that frequency exists, photons emitted in a forward direction have a higher > oscillation rate than photons emitted in a rearward direction, so that the > wavelength in all directions is constant. You completely misinterpret the animation. It shows how a 'photon' would experience the phase of the 'wavelengths' that are already in existence. > Although Henry denies the existence of absolute space, his model is critically > dependent on the emission point being fixed in absolute space. nonsense. It assumes that light moves at c relative to its source and that wavelength is absolute. Having such a low IQ, you Einstein worshippers all have trouble visualizing what happens in the ring, ie., sending moving objects around a rotating torus. You cannot get into your head that the path lengths are different irrespective of the common speed of the objects...mainly because you keep jumping into the rotating frame. > This fact is much more easily appreciated if one considers the two-dimensional > spread of an infinitesimal pulse of photons from a traveling source. Imagine > a satellite orbiting around the Earth that emits a pulse of photons as it passes > over a fixed landmark (the red dot). > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE > (The gif animation works directly from Google Drive on most computers, but > I've noticed that a few old tablets have issues. If the animation does not > work for you, download the gif file and display it locally.) > The top animation is directly analogous to Henry's rayphases program, in that > it displays the photons' entire phase history. The satellite is presumed to be > traveling at 0.5 c, and one can see the symmetrical spread of light around the > satellite. However, rearwards light travels at 0.5 c relative to the emission > point, while forwards light travels at 1.5 c relative to the emission point, all > the while maintaining a constant wavelength. > > The bottom animation illustrates the phase changes of the spreading ring of > photons from the infinitesimal pulse. The dependency of the phase changes on the > position in absolute space of the emission point should be evident. You are an idiot...a really hopeless case.... If anything, the bottom one represents the BaTh concept.... and why do you the hell does your satellite run slap bang into the Earth? It is traveling around the Earth, you know. Can't you program properly? --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 22:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <o41am3$afu$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #402911 |
On 24.12.2016 09:02, HGW wrote: > When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that the two > beams of a ring gyro travel different distances. SR says both beams move > at c in the non-rotating frame and have different travel times, Bath > says the travel times are the same. SR says light is a simple oscillator > and since both rays leave together, they must reunite with different > phase. BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed > wavelength. > > SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the > difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. > Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) > > BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are > (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. For lurkers: Right. The path lengths, that is the length of the two paths of the wave fronts with phase zero (or any constant value) are 2piR(c+v)/c and 2piR(c-v)/c respectively. When these non-oscillating wave fronts with phase zero start simultaneously and move the distances (2piR(c+v)/c) and 2piR(c-v)/c with the speeds (c+v) and (c-v) respectively, they will meet simultaneously a time 2piR/c later and the phases of the non-oscillating wave fronts are obviously still both zero. No phase difference. https://paulba.no/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf https://paulba.no/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf https://paulba.no/FourMirrorSagnac.html It is indeed a weird idea that you can count wavelength along the path of a wave front! Look at the simulation above. There never are any waves along the paths! -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 07:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8b1cd05e-a32b-4736-8e73-2d429f25b7f4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403231 |
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 3:26:29 PM UTC-6, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > On 24.12.2016 09:02, HGW wrote: > > When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that the two > > beams of a ring gyro travel different distances. SR says both beams move > > at c in the non-rotating frame and have different travel times, Bath > > says the travel times are the same. SR says light is a simple oscillator > > and since both rays leave together, they must reunite with different > > phase. BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed > > wavelength. > > > > SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the > > difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. > > Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) > > > > BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are > > (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. > > For lurkers: > > Right. > The path lengths, that is the length of the two paths of > the wave fronts with phase zero (or any constant value) > are 2piR(c+v)/c and 2piR(c-v)/c respectively. > When these non-oscillating wave fronts with phase zero start > simultaneously and move the distances (2piR(c+v)/c) and > 2piR(c-v)/c with the speeds (c+v) and (c-v) respectively, > they will meet simultaneously a time 2piR/c later and > the phases of the non-oscillating wave fronts are obviously > still both zero. No phase difference. > > https://paulba.no/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf > https://paulba.no/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf > https://paulba.no/FourMirrorSagnac.html > > It is indeed a weird idea that you can count wavelength > along the path of a wave front! > Look at the simulation above. > There never are any waves along the paths! There are, of course, discrepancies between what Henry writes in these posts versus what he has written in his Sagnac manifesto and has displayed in his rayphases simulation, so I always have to take what he says with a boulder of rock salt. His use of English language words is occasionally non-standard, as for example when he denies the applicability of the word "frequency" when describing light. He did, however write about my 2D interpretation of his rayphases model, "If anything, the bottom one represents the BaTh concept." Henry therefore affirms his belief that a circular pulse of light emitted from a moving point source shows different rates of phase change in different directions. This is as violent a disavowal of the principle of relativity as one can get, one that has been a central pillar of physics since Galileo. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 08:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o43v3b$1s2f$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403271 |
On 30/12/16 02:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > There are, of course, discrepancies between what Henry writes in these posts > versus what he has written in his Sagnac manifesto and has displayed in his > rayphases simulation, so I always have to take what he says with a boulder of > rock salt. His use of English language words is occasionally non-standard, as > for example when he denies the applicability of the word "frequency" when > describing light. > > He did, however write about my 2D interpretation of his rayphases model, "If > anything, the bottom one represents the BaTh concept." > > Henry therefore affirms his belief that a circular pulse of light emitted from > a moving point source shows different rates of phase change in different > directions. This is as violent a disavowal of the principle of relativity as one > can get, one that has been a central pillar of physics since Galileo. > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE You silly animation does not illustrate my theory as you say it does. You have it upside down, back-to-front..... The top diagram shows tha prediction of Einstein and Lorentz. The bottom one shows the BaTh model of how a light pulse would move away from the source when viewed in the ground frame. Dono is right about you (if nothing else).....You are totally clueless. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 13:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ba299200-39ff-49eb-9aa9-45fb02fb5330@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403377 |
On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 3:27:15 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > On 30/12/16 02:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > > > > There are, of course, discrepancies between what Henry writes in these posts > > versus what he has written in his Sagnac manifesto and has displayed in his > > rayphases simulation, so I always have to take what he says with a boulder of > > rock salt. His use of English language words is occasionally non-standard, as > > for example when he denies the applicability of the word "frequency" when > > describing light. > > > > He did, however write about my 2D interpretation of his rayphases model, "If > > anything, the bottom one represents the BaTh concept." > > > > Henry therefore affirms his belief that a circular pulse of light emitted from > > a moving point source shows different rates of phase change in different > > directions. This is as violent a disavowal of the principle of relativity as one > > can get, one that has been a central pillar of physics since Galileo. > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE > > You silly animation does not illustrate my theory as you say it does. > You have it upside down, back-to-front..... > The top diagram shows tha prediction of Einstein and Lorentz. The bottom > one shows the BaTh model of how a light pulse would move away from the > source when viewed in the ground frame. Compare a horizontal line through the center of the top animation with your rayphases animation. THE CORRESPONDENCE IS EXACT. > Dono is right about you (if nothing else).....You are totally clueless.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 10:52 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o447jq$90j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403384 |
On 30/12/16 08:55, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 3:27:15 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: >> On 30/12/16 02:45, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: >> You silly animation does not illustrate my theory as you say it does. >> You have it upside down, back-to-front..... >> The top diagram shows tha prediction of Einstein and Lorentz. The bottom >> one shows the BaTh model of how a light pulse would move away from the >> source when viewed in the ground frame. > > Compare a horizontal line through the center of the top animation with your > rayphases animation. THE CORRESPONDENCE IS EXACT. Bullshit. Look, forget about rayphases. The wave shown there is not what you think it is. In Sagnac, the wavelengths are the same in both rays, because they both move at c relative to the source. What you cannot get into your head is that when the thing is rotating, there are more wavelengths in one path than the other. During the time a light element goes around the ring from source to receiver, MORE enter the receiver from one side than the other. That does not cause a fringe MOVEMENT....the phase difference just maintains the displacement, at constant speed. >> Dono is right about you (if nothing else).....You are totally clueless. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 03:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <11d93fd7-a9f5-4ff0-b956-c56ae048ff96@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403400 |
On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 5:52:30 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > On 30/12/16 08:55, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > Compare a horizontal line through the center of the top animation with your > > rayphases animation. THE CORRESPONDENCE IS EXACT. > > Bullshit. Nope. You cannot deny the exact correspondence. > Look, forget about rayphases. The wave shown there is not what you think > it is. > > In Sagnac, the wavelengths are the same in both rays, because they both > move at c relative to the source. What you cannot get into your head is > that when the thing is rotating, there are more wavelengths in one path > than the other. During the time a light element goes around the ring > from source to receiver, MORE enter the receiver from one side than the > other. > That does not cause a fringe MOVEMENT....the phase difference just > maintains the displacement, at constant speed. As I have stated repeatedly: You are probably the *least* competent person on these newsgroups to comment on BaTh. You simply do not understand the implications of this so-called "theory", as you put it. >> Dono is right about you (if nothing else).....You are totally clueless.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-31 07:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o46gcj$5bi$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403454 |
On 30/12/16 22:47, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 5:52:30 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: >> On 30/12/16 08:55, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > >>> Compare a horizontal line through the center of the top animation with your >>> rayphases animation. THE CORRESPONDENCE IS EXACT. >> >> Bullshit. > > Nope. You cannot deny the exact correspondence. > >> Look, forget about rayphases. The wave shown there is not what you think >> it is. >> >> In Sagnac, the wavelengths are the same in both rays, because they both >> move at c relative to the source. What you cannot get into your head is >> that when the thing is rotating, there are more wavelengths in one path >> than the other. During the time a light element goes around the ring >> from source to receiver, MORE enter the receiver from one side than the >> other. >> That does not cause a fringe MOVEMENT....the phase difference just >> maintains the displacement, at constant speed. > > As I have stated repeatedly: You are probably the *least* competent person on > these newsgroups to comment on BaTh. You simply do not understand the > implications of this so-called "theory", as you put it. Look, physics is obviously way too hard for you. If you want to continue preaching the gospel of the Einsteinian Church, you should post on talk.religion. >>> Dono is right about you (if nothing else).....You are totally clueless. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 14:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4edf64c2-217c-4759-850e-4ae61816280b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403511 |
On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 2:34:31 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote: > Look, physics is obviously way too hard for you. If you want to continue > preaching the gospel of the Einsteinian Church, you should post on > talk.religion. The only thing that you have demonstrated in this thread is how totally BLIND you are to the problems of your Sagnac analysis. You are totally comfortable with the notion that a circular pulse emitted from a moving "+" source radiates outwards with different rates of phase change in different directions. No sane theory of physics violates the principle of relativity the way that your Sagnac analysis does. You do not even realize how incompatible your Sagnac analysis is with your variable star luminosity explanation! https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcTmVSTUl3cGlzc2s https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8XIf0XcrpOcdzhsazFMZVo3cUE Like it or not, Henry, your Sagnac explanation depends on the existence of an absolute frame and violates a fundamental principle of physics first expounded by Galileo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web