Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380588 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-01 11:06 +1100 |
| Last post | 2016-06-04 04:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 209 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-01 11:06 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-31 18:46 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-01 13:04 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 07:35 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-09 13:15 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-10 04:06 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 04:28 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 17:28 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 11:33 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 20:17 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 12:10 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 14:18 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 20:28 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 12:17 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 20:32 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-24 20:13 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:03 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:58 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 10:03 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-14 15:52 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-24 20:07 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 08:53 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 08:26 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 04:35 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:44 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 06:26 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:01 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 07:28 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 10:52 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-11 16:19 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 17:43 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 11:29 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 13:43 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 12:01 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 14:09 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 08:28 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 17:52 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 17:37 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-02 08:42 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-02 16:43 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-02 19:23 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-02 19:40 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-02 22:09 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-02 12:20 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-04-02 19:58 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 18:22 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-03 07:53 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-03 11:10 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-03 21:13 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 06:04 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-04-03 15:14 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-03 15:10 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-03 15:20 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 07:12 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-16 07:52 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 09:31 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-16 15:16 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 20:15 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-17 04:37 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 06:41 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-17 10:34 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 10:38 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-17 15:56 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-18 08:21 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-18 08:19 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 16:51 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 08:36 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-01 00:30 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 20:18 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-01 20:39 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-06-03 10:52 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-03 18:24 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-03 09:46 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-03 19:15 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-03 21:04 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-03 15:44 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-04 09:10 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-04 05:17 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-04 18:49 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-04 11:23 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 15:28 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-04 03:35 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 18:40 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-04 06:07 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-04 07:28 -0600
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 08:42 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-04 07:43 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:08 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 17:09 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-05 07:20 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-05 16:03 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-06 03:46 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 03:28 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-12 08:27 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-12 09:50 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-13 08:17 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 17:57 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-13 11:29 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 23:08 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-13 19:23 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 09:48 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-14 07:34 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-13 17:44 -0400
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-14 09:02 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 15:02 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-13 08:04 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-13 09:23 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-13 19:35 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-13 23:16 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-14 07:49 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-14 10:39 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-14 21:29 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-14 15:13 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-15 14:19 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-15 21:48 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-16 10:31 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-16 15:13 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-17 09:10 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-16 22:19 -0400
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-17 18:45 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-17 04:58 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 20:25 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-17 09:16 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-17 18:47 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 14:49 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-14 08:12 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 13:57 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-15 14:26 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-15 14:54 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-16 04:29 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:48 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-18 14:40 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 14:50 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 18:18 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-19 04:44 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-19 21:23 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-19 20:22 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-19 14:04 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 12:04 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-20 08:43 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-21 11:50 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 12:09 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-22 09:39 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-22 09:21 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-25 23:27 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-27 05:25 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-27 22:08 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-28 08:02 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-28 15:07 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@....> - 2016-04-29 06:37 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-05-01 14:45 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 14:39 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-03 21:14 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-04 10:23 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-04 06:17 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 08:44 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-04 07:52 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:10 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-04 12:47 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-05 07:43 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-05 06:20 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-05 21:20 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-05 15:02 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-05 09:15 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-06 04:14 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-05 07:00 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-06 13:32 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:25 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-08 07:01 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 09:11 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-07 03:50 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:27 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-08 04:31 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:26 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-08 20:54 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 14:17 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-09 00:18 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:41 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-17 17:38 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:57 -0500
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-10 19:02 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-03 15:21 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 15:05 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-04 03:43 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-03 21:47 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-04 10:26 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-04 23:00 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:57 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-04 04:07 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 11:26 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-04 10:29 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 19:53 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <hgw@...> - 2016-04-04 14:02 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 12:46 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-01 19:25 +0200
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 17:28 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-02 08:36 +1100
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-02 15:46 +0200
This is How it Happened...Summary PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 06:58 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 14:07 +0000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-03 08:00 +1000
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-03 08:33 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 16:47 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 16:54 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-17 18:35 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2016-06-03 07:51 -0700
Re: This is How it Happened...Summary nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2016-06-04 04:06 -0700
Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11 Next page →
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 18:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <neviep$1p6q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381800 |
On 17/04/16 12:19, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 4/16/16 4/16/16 7:10 PM, HGW wrote: >> two clocks synched with a pointer attached to the ends of a spinning rod >> remain in the same synch no matter how they are moved. > > Only in your personal fantasy world. LITERALLY. > > In the world we inhabit, once a pair of clocks are synchronized, > regardless of how they were synchronized, they will NOT "remain in the > same synch no matter how they are moved". There are literally zillions > of experiments that show zillions of ways that clocks can be moved that > destroys their synchronization. Moreover, the synchronization of two > clocks is NOT an "absolute" property -- there can be ways of looking at > them that shows they are synchronized, and other ways of looking at them > that show they are not synchronized (e.g. they can be synchronized in > one inertial frame but not in some other frame). > > Your personal fantasies have no power to force the world to behave as > you wish. I have no idea what you think you are doing, but is CERTAINLY > is not science. Tom, I don't particularly enjoy seeing a human brain disintegrating after being subjected to intense indoctrination and I am saddened by the deterioration of your posts lately. You are apparently still of the opinion that your idol's definition of clock synchronization is valid. Einstein's definition was that clocks are only in synch IF they are set to measure OWLS as c. How blatantly fraudulent! Because mechanically synched clocks are capable of measuring light speeds that are not equal to c, you seem to have thrown some kind of childish tantrum, apparently because you are slowly realizing that your lifelong belief system is tuning out to be a fizzer. > Tom Roberts >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 04:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <919ea7f4-58b7-4fa3-99a8-8c70535db032@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #381800 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 10:19:37 PM UTC-4, tjrob137 wrote: > On 4/16/16 4/16/16 7:10 PM, HGW wrote: > > two clocks synched with a pointer attached to the ends of a spinning rod > > remain in the same synch no matter how they are moved. > > Only in your personal fantasy world. LITERALLY. > > In the world we inhabit, once a pair of clocks are synchronized, regardless of > how they were synchronized, they will NOT "remain in the same synch no matter > how they are moved". There are literally zillions of experiments that show > zillions of ways that clocks can be moved that destroys their synchronization. > Moreover, the synchronization of two clocks is NOT an "absolute" property -- > there can be ways of looking at them that shows they are synchronized, and other > ways of looking at them that show they are not synchronized (e.g. they can be > synchronized in one inertial frame but not in some other frame). That means that clocks in relative motion accumulate clock seconds at different rate....Right? Also that means that a clock second does not represent the same amount of time in different frames.....right? > > Your personal fantasies have no power to force the world to behave as you wish. > I have no idea what you think you are doing, but is CERTAINLY is not science. > > > Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 20:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <80f92adf-6911-47e2-af4e-1f079ef1ea30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #381795 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:10:57 PM UTC-7, HGW wrote: > On 16/04/16 23:13, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > On 16.04.2016 02:31, HGW wrote: > > >>> > >>> So the second postulate is that the speed of light is invariant. > >>> That means that it is c regardless in which inertial frame it > >>> is measured. > >> > >> Why don't you try to learn something. > >> To explain the MMX null result, Lorentz and FitzG concocted their silly > >> transforms by which their rods and clocks varied so that no matter how > >> they moved, they always got the answer c when measuring the speed of > >> light. That idea was based on the 'light clock' interpretation (or the > >> MMX cross beam) that the travel time of the beam would be L/gamma....so > >> they reckoned the parallel length must shrink in that proportion too. > >> That being so, it was deemed impossible to measure variations in light > >> speed as the Earth moved around its orbit...and impossible to measure > >> one's absolute speed. However, those transformed only produced the > >> constant speed c because that was the assumed universal speed in the > >> aether. Bth Lorentz and Poincare (and maybe a few others) subsequently > >> realised that this effectively made the aether redundant, in that it no > >> longer played any part in further considerations. However, that did not > >> mean it disappeared altogether. It was the fundamental medium for > >> unifying light speeds. > > > > Henry, do you think this babble can change the fact that the second > > postulate of SR is that the speed of light in vacuum is invariant? > > Speed relative to what? All speeds are relative. > Why don't you just admit that I am right. I am merely telling you what > everyone knows. Poincare invented Einstein's version of relativity even > though he did not say so in those words. > > Here are the true and quite obvious facts. It was assumed that all light > moved at c relative to an aether medium. To an observer at rest in the > aether, light closed on a moving observer at c+v BUT because his rods > and clocks were supposed to contract in the same proportion with > absolute speed, he would always MEASURE light speed to be c. That is > what Einstein's second postulate means. There is no need to mention any > aether because its role is assumed. > > If all light moves at c in the medium and the contractions are valid, > then all light will be measured as moving at c. By the same token, if > the speed of Norwegian water rats was always u in the aether, every > moving observer would always measure the speed of water rats to be u. > Light is not special in that respect. Lg/Tg = constant. > Unfortunately for Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein Paul B. and the rest of > you dingleberries, there is NO aether and there are no LTs. > > > >>> > >>> The question is the consequences of the second postulate. > >> > >> Words do not cause physical effects. Only an idiot would believe so. > > > > This is in fact a very revealing statement. :-D > > > > Paul: A logical consequence of the second postulate of SR > > is that there is no 'unifying medium'. > > Ralph: Only an idiot would believe that word can cause physical > > effects, so the logical consequence of the second postulate > > cannot be that there is no 'unifying medium'. > > > > I have seen this down under upside down logic before: > > > > Paul: The inevitable logical consequence of the postulates > > of SR is that simultaneity is relative. > > Ralph: My faith is that simultaneity is absolute, > > so relativity of simultaneity cannot be a logical > > consequence of the postulates of SR. > > Paul, two clocks synched with a pointer attached to the ends of a > spinning rod remain in the same synch no matter how they are moved. What > is more, they will correctly measure light speed from a moving source to > be c+v. > > > > >> THe second postulate is fraudulent and becasue it appeared to do away > >> with he need for an aether made Eeinstein famous in the eyes of > >> opportunist dingleberries. > >> We know now that he was a plagiarising liar. > > > > Your opinion of the second postulate is utterly irrelevant > > to what the logical consequences of the second postulate are. > > > > Your claim that the second postulate implies a 'unifying medium' > > is a ridiculous claim, because the consequences of the second > > postulate is the exact opposite. > > Crap. If an absolute medium is assumed along with the LTs, there is no > need to mention the medium...but it is still vital to the theory. How > else could the speed of all Norwegian water rats appear to be constant? Ralph, you haven't the brains that god gave a mud fence. Why are you here at all? How embarrassing for you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 09:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nevd82$16i$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #381795 |
On 17.04.2016 01:10, HGW wrote: > On 16/04/16 23:13, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >> the second postulate of SR is that the speed of light in vacuum is invariant > > Speed relative to what? 'nuff said! -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 18:47 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <neviio$1p6q$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381807 |
On 17/04/16 17:16, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > On 17.04.2016 01:10, HGW wrote: >> On 16/04/16 23:13, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>> >>> the second postulate of SR is that the speed of light in vacuum is >>> invariant >> >> Speed relative to what? > > 'nuff said! Thank you. I gather you now understand my explanation. I'm glad I could help you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 14:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nelm97$gie$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381466 |
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge <hw@...> writes: >On 13/04/16 01:02, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Henry, how could aether possibly be fundamental to SR if it is explicitly >> aether. Henry, do you realize that projection (accusing others of one's Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, apparently you are some sort of masochist, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, you seem to _want_ me to write these replies, Ralph, repeatedly mentioning your name (which is Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) over and over again, Mr. Rabbidge. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, at first I thought you were simply stupid, Ralph, but nobody could be that stupid, Ralph. >>>>> In SR, every observer effectively has a 'personal aether frame'. That is >>>>> a direct result of Lorentz's work. >>>> >>>> 'Personal aether frame'? You are off your meds, Ralph. That is so stupid, Ralph, you missed a "Ralph", Ralph. >> Henry, how could aether possibly be fundamental to SR if it is explicitly >> excluded from being part of SR in the very paper defining SR? >The fact that the aether was 'superfluous' does not mean it was not >fundamental to the theory. Ralph, yes it does, Ralph. It means it was unnecessary, Ralph, and Einstein explicitly stated aether was unnecessary, Mr. Rabbidge. > It is. Its existence enabled Einstein to word >his P2 exactly along the lines of Lorentz's conclusions. The aether made >light speed source independent and the LTs made it observer independent. >Obvious, eh? No, Ralph. Ralph, it is the geometry of spacetime that makes light always move at c. Ralph, Einstein didn't assume even that at the time. Ralph, Einstein started with a simple postulate, Ralph, that light always moves at c, Ralph. Period. No reason, it just does, Ralph. >Einstein plagiarized the idea, stated those findings as a postulate and >derived the maths that were consistent with the postulate. No, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, it was well known at that time that light was always measured as moving at c, and that Maxwell's Equations predicted that light always moved at c, Ralph. He simply stated that was a postulate, Ralph, a law of nature and went from there to see where it led, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. > He had no >reason to mention the aether because it was well and truly included in >the postulate. No, Ralph. He deliberately excluded the aether because there simply was no reason for it whatsoever, Ralph. > How else could light emitted by differently moving >sources possibly find a common speed? Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, that makes an absurd asssumption that light starts off at one speed and changes its speed as it "finds" a common speed. Ludicrous, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Light simply travels at c, Ralph. >> Actually, getting rid of the aether was one of the >> breakthroughs of SR. I'm sure Einstein's photoelectric work helped him >> with that, as it showed him that light could be more particlelike thus >> not needing an aether. >So now you are agreeing with BaTh...thanks Moron-y. There is hope for >you yet. No, Ralph. I can never agree with an absurd theory that violates the laws of physics and all observations, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 08:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nemg94$19r4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381515 |
On 14/04/16 00:49, Michael Moron-y wrote: >> The fact that the aether was 'superfluous' does not mean it was not >> fundamental to the theory. > > Henry, yes it does, Henry. It means it was unnecessary, Henry, and > Einstein explicitly stated aether was unnecessary, Dr. Wilson. > >> It is. Its existence enabled Einstein to word >> his P2 exactly along the lines of Lorentz's conclusions. The aether made >> light speed source independent and the LTs made it observer independent. >> Obvious, eh? > > No, Henry. Henry, it is the geometry of spacetime that makes light always > move at c. Henry, Einstein didn't assume even that at the time. Henry, > Einstein started with a simple postulate, Henry, that light always moves > at c, Henry. Period. No reason, it just does, Henry. Moron why don't you read the history of Einstein's theft? You will find in any good description the fact that Einstein, Lorentz and Poincare (who had already developed SR before Einstein) all assumed the existence of the single absolute aether. It was fundamental to their theories even though there was no need to mention it. >> Einstein plagiarized the idea, stated those findings as a postulate and >> derived the maths that were consistent with the postulate. > > No, Henry. Henry George Wilson, DSc., it was well known at that time that > light was always measured as moving at c, and that Maxwell's Equations > predicted that light always moved at c, Henry. He simply stated that > was a postulate, Henry, a law of nature and went from there to see where > it led, Henry George Wilson, DSc.. Maxwell's equations apply to a wave in a dielectric medium. Everyone, except Walter Ritz and a few other intelligent people, believed such a thing existed so nobody asked any questions. Maxwell's equations don't apply in truly empty space where e and mu are both zero. Maxwell derived the value of the universal constant c, which is related to the mutual induction between electric and magnetic fields. >> He had no >> reason to mention the aether because it was well and truly included in >> the postulate. > > No, Henry. He deliberately excluded the aether because there simply > was no reason for it whatsoever. No moron-y, his theory certainly needed it, just as LET did. It was written into his P2. >> How else could light emitted by differently moving >> sources possibly find a common speed? > > Henry George Wilson, DSc., that makes an absurd asssumption that light starts > off at one speed and changes its speed as it "finds" a common speed. > Ludicrous, Henry George Wilson, DSc.. Light simply travels at c, Henry. Yes, the fairies are obviously heavily involved...or maybe Harnagel's god. They adjust the speed of every photon in the universe so it is precisely c relative to little planet Earth, where Harnagel's and numerous other gods continue to create havoc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 13:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neo7k9$d92$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381559 |
HGW <hw@...> writes: >> No, Henry. Henry, it is the geometry of spacetime that makes light always >> move at c. Henry, Einstein didn't assume even that at the time. Henry, >> Einstein started with a simple postulate, Henry, that light always moves >> at c, Henry. Period. No reason, it just does, Henry. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, I am glad you let me know, Ralph, that you like it when I refer to you by your real name (which is Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge), Ralph. Ralph, I still find your reaction to your real name (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) to be truly bizarre, Ralph, and editing my posts to insult the great Australian scientist Henry George Wilson (who never posts here) by claiming to be him, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, why do you insult Dr. Wilson that way? >Moron why don't you read the history of Einstein's theft? Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, all I see is two different people coming up with similar solutions, Ralph, from completely different logic, Ralph. Kind of odd that using different logic to find similar conclusions would be considered "theft" by you, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph, that's kind of like if two scientists concluded gravity followed the inverse square law if one did so by studying the orbits of planets and the other by measuring the force between two masses, Ralph. > You will find >in any good description the fact that Einstein, Lorentz and Poincare >(who had already developed SR before Einstein) all assumed the existence >of the single absolute aether. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, how dense is that head of yours, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge? Ralph, once again, Einstein explicitly excluded the aether from consideration, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, excluding the aether is most explicitly not "assuming the existence of the absolute aether", Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph, quit projecting your own flawed thinking onto Einstein, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, if you want to prove him wrong, use what he really did write or say, not what you (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) imagine him saying, Ralph. >Maxwell's equations apply to a wave in a dielectric medium. Everyone, >except Walter Ritz and a few other intelligent people, believed such a >thing existed so nobody asked any questions. Yes, Ralph, it was a flawed thinking of the time that an aether must exist, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. One of the breakthroughs of SR, Ralph, was to explicitly exclude it from consideration like Einstein did, Ralph. >Maxwell's equations don't apply in truly empty space where e and mu are >both zero. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, epsilon0 and mu0 are not zero in empty space, Ralph. That is an assumption of yours, without basis, Ralph, not anything created by Einstein, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. BTW, the product of e0 and mu0 defines the speed of light to be c in all frames, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. If the speed of light was variable, e0 and/or mu0 would also have to be variable, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. >Maxwell derived the value of the universal constant c, which is related >to the mutual induction between electric and magnetic fields. From the constants e0 and mu0, Ralph, which is why c is constant always, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. >No moron-y, his theory certainly needed it, just as LET did. It was >written into his P2. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, I thought you used some form of English down under, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, how does explicitly excluding the aether become "needing" it in that twisted Oz-speak of yours, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge? >>> How else could light emitted by differently moving >>> sources possibly find a common speed? >> >> Henry George Wilson, DSc., that makes an absurd asssumption that light starts >> off at one speed and changes its speed as it "finds" a common speed. >> Ludicrous, Henry George Wilson, DSc.. Light simply travels at c, Henry. >Yes, the fairies are obviously heavily involved...or maybe Harnagel's >god. They adjust the speed of every photon in the universe so it is >precisely c relative to little planet Earth, where Harnagel's and >numerous other gods continue to create havoc. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, always travelling at c means the speed never, ever changes, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, your magic speed-changing photon is a creation of Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, not Albert Einstein, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 14:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nepqh6$14o8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381643 |
On 14/04/16 23:57, Michael Moron-y wrote: "I am now so desperate to keep my faith in the plagiarizing fool known as Albert Einstein that I will write anything at all in an attempt to defend him, even if it makes me appear absolutely stupid."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neqvbi$d1$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381715 |
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, what is the matter, Ralph? Ralph, are you mad at yourself for being stupid enough to mess with my posts, Ralph? Even though you, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, were repeatedly told not to, Ralph? Ralph, you love to pretend that you are some sort of scientist, Ralph. Yet a true scientist is smart enough to be able to evaluate the consequences of his actions, Ralph, and decide whether the consequences are acceptible or even desirable. Ralph, do you now realize how a consequence of messing with my posts is to reveal to more and more people that your real name, Ralph, is Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, Ralph? Now, Ralph, have you learned your lesson, Ralph? Or do I need to punish you more, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 04:29 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nerbua$1mp1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381732 |
On 16/04/16 00:54, Michael Moroney wrote: "sorry, I am such a pathetic idiot that I cannot talk science at all."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 03:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf1len$dug$6@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381740 |
HGW <hw@...> writes: Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, I am so glad that you love my posts, Ralph, where I get to write "Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge" over and over again, Ralph. I didn't know how much you loved that, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph, I will have to remember to respond to you (that is, to Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) more often, Ralph. Ralph, I will try to do better from now on, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, and reply more often. >"sorry, I am such a pathetic idiot that I cannot talk science at all." So, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, why are you being a pathetic idiot who refuses to talk science at all, Ralph? Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, Paul Andersen has written many excellent responses to your (Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge's) posts, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph, instead of responding to them scientifically, you just bury your head, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, screaming "All Lies!!!". Ralph, why not prove Mr. Andersen wrong instead, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@...> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 14:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nf1of9$13s2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381864 |
On 18/04/16 13:48, Michael Moroney wrote: > HGW <hw@...> writes: > Paul Andersen has > written many excellent responses to your (Henry George Wilson DSc's) > posts, Henry George Wilson DSc. Henry, instead of responding to them > scientifically, you just bury your head, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, > screaming "All Lies!!!". Henry, why not prove Mr. Andersen wrong > instead, Henry George Wilson DSc? > I have already proved wrong many times everything on Paul B's website. He is a really funny guy!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 14:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf2s7q$b1i$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381868 |
HGW <hw@...> writes: >On 18/04/16 13:48, Michael Moroney wrote: >> HGW <hw@...> writes: >> >Paul Andersen has >> written many excellent responses to your (Henry George Wilson DSc's) >> posts, Henry George Wilson DSc. Henry, instead of responding to them >> scientifically, you just bury your head, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, >> screaming "All Lies!!!". Henry, why not prove Mr. Andersen wrong >> instead, Henry George Wilson DSc? >I have already proved wrong many times everything on Paul B's website. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, it's great that you find my posts so enjoyable, Ralph, which I can tell by the way you repeatedly encourage me to keep posting this way, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Now, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, can you tell us, Ralph, when you *ever* tried to prove Mr. Andersen's posts wrong, Ralph, or addressed anything in any of them at all, Ralph, or that you even read them, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, all you do in response to them, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, is to bury your head in the sand, screaming "All lies!!!". p.s. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, you missed a "Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge", Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 18:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ee77d55f-ffe8-424a-bf90-ec0083ad57c5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #381890 |
On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 9:51:04 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > HGW <hw@...> writes: > Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, it's great that you find my posts so enjoyable, > Ralph, which I can tell by the way you repeatedly encourage me to keep > posting this way, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Now, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, > can you tell us, Ralph, when you *ever* tried to prove Mr. Andersen's > posts wrong, Ralph, or addressed anything in any of them at all, Ralph, or > that you even read them, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, > all you do in response to them, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, is to bury your > head in the sand, screaming "All lies!!!". > > p.s. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, you missed a "Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge", Ralph > Malcolm Rabbidge. Domain Name: SCISITE.INFO Domain ID: D29703178-LRMS WHOIS Server: Referral URL: www.melbourneit.com.au Updated Date: 2015-08-26T21:02:43Z Creation Date: 2009-09-15T21:38:26Z Registry Expiry Date: 2016-09-15T21:38:26Z Sponsoring Registrar: Melbourne IT, Ltd Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13 Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok Registrant ID: B125303275498915 Registrant Name: Ralph Rabbidge Registrant Organization: Ralph Rabbidge Registrant Street: 8 Barlings Drive Registrant City: Tomakin Registrant State/Province: NSW Registrant Postal Code: 2537 Registrant Country: AU Registrant Phone: +61.732492500 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +61.738322604 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: rmrab at bigpond.com Admin ID: B125303275498913 Admin Name: Ralph Rabbidge Admin Organization: Ralph Rabbidge Admin Street: 8 Barlings Drive Admin City: Tomakin Admin State/Province: NSW Admin Postal Code: 2537 Admin Country: AU Admin Phone: +61.732492500 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: +61.732492633 Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: rmrab at bigpond.com Tech ID: B125303275498914 Tech Name: Hostmaster Telstra Tech Organization: Telstra Corporation Tech Street: Level 5 Tech Street: 400 George St Tech City: Sydney Tech State/Province: NSW Tech Postal Code: 2000 Tech Country: AU Tech Phone: +61.286552942 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: +61.282252998 Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com Billing ID: A12530376603336 Billing Name: Hostmaster Telstra Billing Organization: Telstra Corporation Billing Street: Level 5 Billing Street: 400 George St Billing City: Sydney Billing State/Province: NSW Billing Postal Code: 2000 Billing Country: AU Billing Phone: +61.286552942 Billing Phone Ext: Billing Fax: +61.282252998 Billing Fax Ext: Billing Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com Name Server: BR-DNS10.TMNS.NET.AU Name Server: BR-DNS11.TMNS.NET.AU Name Server: SJ-DNS01.TMNS.NET.AU DNSSEC: unsigned >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-16T05:02:54Z <<<
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 04:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e489818-10ba-4c89-a5b8-29f618f37e69@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #381927 |
On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 7:18:42 PM UTC-6, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > Domain Name: SCISITE.INFO > Domain ID: D29703178-LRMS > WHOIS Server: > Referral URL: www.melbourneit.com.au > Updated Date: 2015-08-26T21:02:43Z > Creation Date: 2009-09-15T21:38:26Z > Registry Expiry Date: 2016-09-15T21:38:26Z > Sponsoring Registrar: Melbourne IT, Ltd > Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13 > Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok > Registrant ID: B125303275498915 > Registrant Name: Ralph Rabbidge > Registrant Organization: Ralph Rabbidge > Registrant Street: 8 Barlings Drive > Registrant City: Tomakin > Registrant State/Province: NSW > Registrant Postal Code: 2537 > Registrant Country: AU > Registrant Phone: +61.732492500 > Registrant Phone Ext: > Registrant Fax: +61.738322604 > Registrant Fax Ext: > Registrant Email: rmrab at bigpond.com > Admin ID: B125303275498913 > Admin Name: Ralph Rabbidge > Admin Organization: Ralph Rabbidge > Admin Street: 8 Barlings Drive > Admin City: Tomakin > Admin State/Province: NSW > Admin Postal Code: 2537 > Admin Country: AU > Admin Phone: +61.732492500 > Admin Phone Ext: > Admin Fax: +61.732492633 > Admin Fax Ext: > Admin Email: rmrab at bigpond.com > Tech ID: B125303275498914 > Tech Name: Hostmaster Telstra > Tech Organization: Telstra Corporation > Tech Street: Level 5 > Tech Street: 400 George St > Tech City: Sydney > Tech State/Province: NSW > Tech Postal Code: 2000 > Tech Country: AU > Tech Phone: +61.286552942 > Tech Phone Ext: > Tech Fax: +61.282252998 > Tech Fax Ext: > Tech Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com > Billing ID: A12530376603336 > Billing Name: Hostmaster Telstra > Billing Organization: Telstra Corporation > Billing Street: Level 5 > Billing Street: 400 George St > Billing City: Sydney > Billing State/Province: NSW > Billing Postal Code: 2000 > Billing Country: AU > Billing Phone: +61.286552942 > Billing Phone Ext: > Billing Fax: +61.282252998 > Billing Fax Ext: > Billing Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com > Name Server: BR-DNS10.TMNS.NET.AU > Name Server: BR-DNS11.TMNS.NET.AU > Name Server: SJ-DNS01.TMNS.NET.AU > DNSSEC: unsigned > >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-16T05:02:54Z <<< Well, I guess THAT nails down the case for impersonation. "Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters." -- Albert Einstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 21:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nf60kf$i0q$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #381942 |
On 19.04.2016 13:44, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 7:18:42 PM UTC-6, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: >> >> Domain Name: SCISITE.INFO >> Domain ID: D29703178-LRMS >> WHOIS Server: >> Referral URL: www.melbourneit.com.au >> Updated Date: 2015-08-26T21:02:43Z >> Creation Date: 2009-09-15T21:38:26Z >> Registry Expiry Date: 2016-09-15T21:38:26Z >> Sponsoring Registrar: Melbourne IT, Ltd >> Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13 >> Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok >> Registrant ID: B125303275498915 >> Registrant Name: Ralph Rabbidge >> Registrant Organization: Ralph Rabbidge >> Registrant Street: 8 Barlings Drive >> Registrant City: Tomakin >> Registrant State/Province: NSW >> Registrant Postal Code: 2537 >> Registrant Country: AU >> Registrant Phone: +61.732492500 >> Registrant Phone Ext: >> Registrant Fax: +61.738322604 >> Registrant Fax Ext: >> Registrant Email: rmrab at bigpond.com >> Admin ID: B125303275498913 >> Admin Name: Ralph Rabbidge >> Admin Organization: Ralph Rabbidge >> Admin Street: 8 Barlings Drive >> Admin City: Tomakin >> Admin State/Province: NSW >> Admin Postal Code: 2537 >> Admin Country: AU >> Admin Phone: +61.732492500 >> Admin Phone Ext: >> Admin Fax: +61.732492633 >> Admin Fax Ext: >> Admin Email: rmrab at bigpond.com >> Tech ID: B125303275498914 >> Tech Name: Hostmaster Telstra >> Tech Organization: Telstra Corporation >> Tech Street: Level 5 >> Tech Street: 400 George St >> Tech City: Sydney >> Tech State/Province: NSW >> Tech Postal Code: 2000 >> Tech Country: AU >> Tech Phone: +61.286552942 >> Tech Phone Ext: >> Tech Fax: +61.282252998 >> Tech Fax Ext: >> Tech Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com >> Billing ID: A12530376603336 >> Billing Name: Hostmaster Telstra >> Billing Organization: Telstra Corporation >> Billing Street: Level 5 >> Billing Street: 400 George St >> Billing City: Sydney >> Billing State/Province: NSW >> Billing Postal Code: 2000 >> Billing Country: AU >> Billing Phone: +61.286552942 >> Billing Phone Ext: >> Billing Fax: +61.282252998 >> Billing Fax Ext: >> Billing Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com >> Name Server: BR-DNS10.TMNS.NET.AU >> Name Server: BR-DNS11.TMNS.NET.AU >> Name Server: SJ-DNS01.TMNS.NET.AU >> DNSSEC: unsigned >>>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-16T05:02:54Z <<< > > Well, I guess THAT nails down the case for impersonation. It's nailed years ago. But note that his full name is Ralph Malcom Rabbidge. There are real scientists with the name Ralph Rabbidge, that's why I am always careful to write his full name. Proof of his name: He has actually applied for a couple of patents: http://www.ipaustralia.com.au/applicant/rabbidge-ralph-malcolm-mr/patents/AU2006100406/ http://www.ipaustralia.com.au/applicant/rabbidge-ralph-malcolm-mr/patents/AU2006230645/ Note that his title is Mr. :-D Proof that this is 'our Ralph': http://www.patentlookup.com.au/patents/341921 Check the address! Ralph doesn't like dogs: http://www.scisite.info/dogtrap.html http://www.scisite.info/dogtrap.jpg :-D -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 20:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf6419$n5s$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381963 |
"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> writes: >It's nailed years ago. >But note that his full name is Ralph Malcom Rabbidge. >There are real scientists with the name Ralph Rabbidge, >that's why I am always careful to write his full name. >Proof of his name: >He has actually applied for a couple of patents: >http://www.ipaustralia.com.au/applicant/rabbidge-ralph-malcolm-mr/patents/AU2006100406/ Very interesting. My sister's house has similar gutters, designed by an inventor who used to live there. And they're older than Ralph's patent. So Ralph, did you steal that invention from my sister's house?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 14:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf5dsj$g2d$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #381927 |
Hah! (What happened, Ralph?) Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> writes: >Domain Name: SCISITE.INFO >Domain ID: D29703178-LRMS >WHOIS Server: >Referral URL: www.melbourneit.com.au >Updated Date: 2015-08-26T21:02:43Z >Creation Date: 2009-09-15T21:38:26Z >Registry Expiry Date: 2016-09-15T21:38:26Z >Sponsoring Registrar: Melbourne IT, Ltd >Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13 >Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok >Registrant ID: B125303275498915 >Registrant Name: Ralph Rabbidge >Registrant Organization: Ralph Rabbidge >Registrant Street: 8 Barlings Drive >Registrant City: Tomakin >Registrant State/Province: NSW >Registrant Postal Code: 2537 >Registrant Country: AU >Registrant Phone: +61.732492500 >Registrant Phone Ext: >Registrant Fax: +61.738322604 >Registrant Fax Ext: >Registrant Email: rmrab at bigpond.com >Admin ID: B125303275498913 >Admin Name: Ralph Rabbidge >Admin Organization: Ralph Rabbidge >Admin Street: 8 Barlings Drive >Admin City: Tomakin >Admin State/Province: NSW >Admin Postal Code: 2537 >Admin Country: AU >Admin Phone: +61.732492500 >Admin Phone Ext: >Admin Fax: +61.732492633 >Admin Fax Ext: >Admin Email: rmrab at bigpond.com >Tech ID: B125303275498914 >Tech Name: Hostmaster Telstra >Tech Organization: Telstra Corporation >Tech Street: Level 5 >Tech Street: 400 George St >Tech City: Sydney >Tech State/Province: NSW >Tech Postal Code: 2000 >Tech Country: AU >Tech Phone: +61.286552942 >Tech Phone Ext: >Tech Fax: +61.282252998 >Tech Fax Ext: >Tech Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com >Billing ID: A12530376603336 >Billing Name: Hostmaster Telstra >Billing Organization: Telstra Corporation >Billing Street: Level 5 >Billing Street: 400 George St >Billing City: Sydney >Billing State/Province: NSW >Billing Postal Code: 2000 >Billing Country: AU >Billing Phone: +61.286552942 >Billing Phone Ext: >Billing Fax: +61.282252998 >Billing Fax Ext: >Billing Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com >Name Server: BR-DNS10.TMNS.NET.AU >Name Server: BR-DNS11.TMNS.NET.AU >Name Server: SJ-DNS01.TMNS.NET.AU >DNSSEC: unsigned >>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-16T05:02:54Z <<<
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 12:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf5of1$1bdv$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381927 |
On 4/18/2016 8:18 PM, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote: > > Domain Name: SCISITE.INFO > Domain ID: D29703178-LRMS > WHOIS Server: > Referral URL: www.melbourneit.com.au > Updated Date: 2015-08-26T21:02:43Z > Creation Date: 2009-09-15T21:38:26Z > Registry Expiry Date: 2016-09-15T21:38:26Z > Sponsoring Registrar: Melbourne IT, Ltd > Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13 > Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok > Registrant ID: B125303275498915 > Registrant Name: Ralph Rabbidge > Registrant Organization: Ralph Rabbidge > Registrant Street: 8 Barlings Drive > Registrant City: Tomakin > Registrant State/Province: NSW > Registrant Postal Code: 2537 > Registrant Country: AU > Registrant Phone: +61.732492500 > Registrant Phone Ext: > Registrant Fax: +61.738322604 > Registrant Fax Ext: > Registrant Email: rmrab at bigpond.com > Admin ID: B125303275498913 > Admin Name: Ralph Rabbidge > Admin Organization: Ralph Rabbidge > Admin Street: 8 Barlings Drive > Admin City: Tomakin > Admin State/Province: NSW > Admin Postal Code: 2537 > Admin Country: AU > Admin Phone: +61.732492500 > Admin Phone Ext: > Admin Fax: +61.732492633 > Admin Fax Ext: > Admin Email: rmrab at bigpond.com > Tech ID: B125303275498914 > Tech Name: Hostmaster Telstra > Tech Organization: Telstra Corporation > Tech Street: Level 5 > Tech Street: 400 George St > Tech City: Sydney > Tech State/Province: NSW > Tech Postal Code: 2000 > Tech Country: AU > Tech Phone: +61.286552942 > Tech Phone Ext: > Tech Fax: +61.282252998 > Tech Fax Ext: > Tech Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com > Billing ID: A12530376603336 > Billing Name: Hostmaster Telstra > Billing Organization: Telstra Corporation > Billing Street: Level 5 > Billing Street: 400 George St > Billing City: Sydney > Billing State/Province: NSW > Billing Postal Code: 2000 > Billing Country: AU > Billing Phone: +61.286552942 > Billing Phone Ext: > Billing Fax: +61.282252998 > Billing Fax Ext: > Billing Email: domainadmin at server-dns.com > Name Server: BR-DNS10.TMNS.NET.AU > Name Server: BR-DNS11.TMNS.NET.AU > Name Server: SJ-DNS01.TMNS.NET.AU > DNSSEC: unsigned >>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-16T05:02:54Z <<< 8 Barlings Road in Tomakin is the one with the dirt driveway. No doubt an irritation to the neighbors. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web