Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
About "practical" and "unpractical" Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100 |
| Subject | About "practical" and "unpractical" |
| Message-ID | <n6avcb$c74$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
Użytkownik "Tom Roberts" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:Y-idnVq06PgXFhXLnZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com... > why is it THE reference for time measurement? |Because it was selected as the most practical, stable, and reproducible of all |candidates, back in 1967. As we can see at GPS, idiots like Tom are not stupid enough to practically use their "practical" shit, however. Their stupidity allows them only to praise it theoretically - not more. Great Guru was obviously wrong about infinity of stupidity. > Is it > theoretically optimal, or more of an engineering 'best we can do today'? | In any case it is unlikely to be |revised in the foreseeable future. Yes! Yes! Yes! Common mortals simply have no choice, but to obey the idiocies of the relativistic moron forever.
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web