Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373178
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | About "practical" and "unpractical" |
| Date | 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <n6avcb$c74$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
Użytkownik "Tom Roberts" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:Y-idnVq06PgXFhXLnZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com... > why is it THE reference for time measurement? |Because it was selected as the most practical, stable, and reproducible of all |candidates, back in 1967. As we can see at GPS, idiots like Tom are not stupid enough to practically use their "practical" shit, however. Their stupidity allows them only to praise it theoretically - not more. Great Guru was obviously wrong about infinity of stupidity. > Is it > theoretically optimal, or more of an engineering 'best we can do today'? | In any case it is unlikely to be |revised in the foreseeable future. Yes! Yes! Yes! Common mortals simply have no choice, but to obey the idiocies of the relativistic moron forever.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
About "practical" and "unpractical" Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-03 12:06 +0100
csiph-web