Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #369933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 04:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 05:05 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:01 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:19 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 06:50 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:11 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:41 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:04 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:08 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:31 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:59 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:14 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:48 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:09 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 18:37 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:51 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-14 12:21 -0800
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:25 +0000
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:22 -0500
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:04 -0600
Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-16 18:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:08 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:21 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 08:59 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:16 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:27 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 10:20 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:47 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 12:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:11 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:12 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:27 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 14:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:17 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 15:46 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 06:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-15 05:45 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:42 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 21:07 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:09 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:17 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:30 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 22:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 18:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:13 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 15:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:47 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 10:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 13:44 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 12:00 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 16:24 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:55 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:30 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 19:11 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:25 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 01:28 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 20:56 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 08:29 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-14 05:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:13 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:13 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:22 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:32 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 19:36 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 11:15 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 09:10 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-17 13:55 +1100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-16 22:06 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 19:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 06:44 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 06:15 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 09:36 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:33 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-22 05:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 05:18 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 14:22 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 09:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-22 19:56 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 23:01 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 15:31 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-22 17:26 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 20:38 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-23 17:05 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 02:55 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:23 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-24 05:23 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-24 10:53 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 07:28 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 04:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:54 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-11-25 08:29 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 10:17 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 08:54 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 19:42 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 13:21 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 05:06 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:17 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 04:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 04:48 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-26 05:25 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 07:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 20:56 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:34 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 08:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 18:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 12:43 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-28 07:55 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-07 17:53 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 03:57 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 20:11 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 07:45 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 04:31 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-29 21:35 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 13:57 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 04:02 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 19:38 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-30 05:24 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-29 21:09 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:40 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 04:26 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-24 19:37 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 12:06 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-24 21:03 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-30 05:14 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:53 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-29 12:42 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-29 22:49 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 16:51 -0600
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-02 16:34 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-02 15:57 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-12 17:21 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:02 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 10:10 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 22:07 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-24 23:29 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-25 01:39 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-25 02:04 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-25 06:04 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:27 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 11:22 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 12:42 -0800
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27idi$vh6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369959 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 15:34 Y napsal(a): > > Oh look, keep your continental philosophical BS wrapped up. Colors are objective. Newton even broke white light up into components colors, to show that prisms didn't put color into light. No objections about what was observed. It is the classic. But observed does not mean objective. Human opinion to say it is of this colour is required, therefore it subjective. It is not intrinsic property. Also, different humans, different evaluation, as it depends on eyes and on brains. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 08:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2e3f8fc0-0c8d-4f6e-9fc0-ae04cc96eaf9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369965 |
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:04:30 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 14/11/2015 v 15:34 Y napsal(a): > > > > > Oh look, keep your continental philosophical BS wrapped up. Colors are objective. Newton even broke white light up into components colors, to show that prisms didn't put color into light. > > No objections about what was observed. It is the classic. > > But observed does not mean objective. > Human opinion to say it is of this colour is required, > therefore it subjective. It is not intrinsic property. Science regards human observation. > Also, different humans, different evaluation, > as it depends on eyes and on brains. Tell that to plants that reflect green and blue light, because they adapted in an environment where only red light was available. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 17:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27nh0$jc8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369975 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:08 Y napsal(a): > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:04:30 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: >> No objections about what was observed. It is the classic. >> >> But observed does not mean objective. >> Human opinion to say it is of this colour is required, >> therefore it subjective. It is not intrinsic property. > > Science regards human observation. Science also distinguishes objective parameters, intrinsic to observed objects, and subjective parameters, involving subject opinion. -------------- Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. Being blue is not attribute of light nor object. It is attribute of the subject evaluation, while the other subject may ( and often do ) evaluate it differently. -------------- Same as a food is tasteful only with human opinion it is tasteful. Being tasteful is not attribute of the food. It is attribute of the subject evaluation, while the other subject may ( and often do ) evaluate it differently. > >> Also, different humans, different evaluation, >> as it depends on eyes and on brains. > > Tell that to plants that reflect green and blue light, because they adapted in an environment where only red light was available. > Plants do not care about our human colour schema, do they ? They absorb some short wave light and long wave light, with photon energies matching differences of chlorophyll molecular orbital energies. They do not care at all if we call the light blue or red. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n27o1u$gtr$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369979 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał: > Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:08 Y napsal(a): >> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:04:30 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > >>> No objections about what was observed. It is the classic. >>> >>> But observed does not mean objective. >>> Human opinion to say it is of this colour is required, therefore it >>> subjective. It is not intrinsic property. >> >> Science regards human observation. > > objective parameters, intrinsic to observed objects, > and subjective parameters, involving subject opinion. > -------------- > Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. Bullshit, you misunderstood entirely what the monochromatic blue light stands for. There is namely NO way having subjective evaluation. This is an OBJECTIVE evaluation ONLY. > Being blue is not attribute of light nor object. LOL, of course is it. Without which you can't (CANNOT) see the object or the entity. > > It is attribute of the subject evaluation, > while the other subject may ( and often do ) evaluate it differently. NOO. You are such a moron, pout.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 17:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27p5c$qjp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369980 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:38 Ty Knotts napsal(a): > W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał: >> objective parameters, intrinsic to observed objects, >> and subjective parameters, involving subject opinion. >> -------------- >> Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. > > Bullshit, you misunderstood entirely what the monochromatic blue light > stands for. There is namely NO way having subjective evaluation. This is > an OBJECTIVE evaluation ONLY. You do not know what you are talking about. Calling light from a particular wavelength range blue is purely human convention, based on majority opinion. IF as you say being blue is light attribute, it cannot be changed by human decision. If we decide blue is above 435 nm instead of current 430 nm, what happen with "objective" light attribute of previously violet light with wl 420 nm ? Will it be still "objectively" violet, or "objectively" blue already ? > >> Being blue is not attribute of light nor object. > > LOL, of course is it. Without which you can't (CANNOT) see the object or > the entity. You confuse objective with existing and subjective with apparent. You need not objective colour to see the light. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n27qv8$pde$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369985 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał: >>> objective parameters, intrinsic to observed objects, and subjective >>> parameters, involving subject opinion. -------------- >>> Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. >> >> Bullshit, you misunderstood entirely what the monochromatic blue light >> stands for. There is namely NO way having subjective evaluation. This >> is an OBJECTIVE evaluation ONLY. > > You do not know what you are talking about. > > Calling light from a particular wavelength range blue is purely human > convention, based on majority opinion. But is not a personal subjective assessment, you doped scandal. All will agree on the wavelength of that color, disregard any language. Hence you are totally wrong in Divergetn Matter by saying that the "colors are subjective". They are not. You are so fuckning stupid. Is egzactly the opposite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n281v3$nvd$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #369985 |
Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> writes: >Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:38 Ty Knotts napsal(a): >>> Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. >> >> Bullshit, you misunderstood entirely what the monochromatic blue light >> stands for. There is namely NO way having subjective evaluation. This is >> an OBJECTIVE evaluation ONLY. >You do not know what you are talking about. >Calling light from a particular wavelength range blue >is purely human convention, based on majority opinion. >IF as you say being blue is light attribute, >it cannot be changed by human decision. >If we decide blue is above 435 nm instead of current 430 nm, >what happen with "objective" light attribute >of previously violet light with wl 420 nm ? >Will it be still "objectively" violet, >or "objectively" blue already ? I remember reading somewhere how color perception is partly cultural, you learn the "boundaries" when a small child. Specifically, I remember reading how a Korean person would identify a green traffic light as blue, because the boundary between green and blue are at a longer wavelength. Westerners see it as green tinged toward blue (supposedly to help color blind people identify it better). Unfortunately, I don't have a reference for whatever I read, or any Korean people around.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 20:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n284nv$gsn$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370008 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Michael Moroney napisał: > I remember reading somewhere how color perception is partly cultural, You seems severely retarded.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n285os$gsn$7@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369980 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik reber g=emc^2 napisał: > NO Color means waves.Gravity works with no wqave function.Its particle > force all the way to the core.(down) TreBert Me and Pout were talking about objects and colors. A gravity wave may be any. (if existent). However I never understood whether the empticity of space, or spacetime, would impose a NATURAL frequency to a gravity wave. (and what this specific frequency would be). Thank you for your valuable input.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-03 14:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n3pkdm$ol4$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369980 |
суббота., Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:10:26 -0800 пользователь HVAC написал: > In this case it's the misnomer gravitational 'energy'. Gravity is not > energy per se. It is merely space's response to the presence of a mass. Absolutely. But this only because not the Mass, but because Matter is observed where Gravity phenomena takes place. The intrinsic characteristic of the Matter Diverging explain why Gravity always feels LOCALLY directed. It appears clearly that Gravity can only be explained by my theory of Divergent Matter locally.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Y <yanarchi@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 08:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6f7c914a-4493-4bbc-8394-f7fccb5c9331@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #369979 |
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:04:30 AM UTC+10, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 14/11/2015 v 15:34 Y napsal(a): > > > > > Oh look, keep your continental philosophical BS wrapped up. Colors are objective. Newton even broke white light up into components colors, to show that prisms didn't put color into light. > > No objections about what was observed. It is the classic. > > But observed does not mean objective. > Human opinion to say it is of this colour is required, > therefore it subjective. It is not intrinsic property. I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light. > Also, different humans, different evaluation, > as it depends on eyes and on brains. It doesn't have to. -y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n27ol5$jml$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369981 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał: > I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the > surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of > wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors > could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and > "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light. Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when you say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific wavelength, aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to be taken up and debate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n27pnj$t0u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #369982 |
Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a): > W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał: > >> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the >> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of >> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors >> could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and >> "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light. > > Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so > inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when you > say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific wavelength, > aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to be taken up > and debate. > DM disqualifies you by its own. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 18:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n27v0n$393$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #369988 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał: > Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a): >> W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał: >> >>> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the >>> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of >>> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, >>> colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in >>> detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light. >> >> Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so >> inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when >> you say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific >> wavelength, aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to >> be taken up and debate. >> > DM disqualifies you by its own. Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that "Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is exactly what my Divergent Matter says. You are peripheral, or rather not even.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 14:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p34f4b5gklkuvn16nrjkldu2mauap5jj7j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370000 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:37:11 +0000 (UTC), Ty Knotts
<TyKnotts@hotmail.org> wrote:
>W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik Poutnik napisal:
>
>> Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a):
>>> W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik Y napisal:
>>>
>>>> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the
>>>> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of
>>>> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system,
>>>> colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in
>>>> detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light.
>>>
>>> Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so
>>> inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when
>>> you say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific
>>> wavelength, aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to
>>> be taken up and debate.
>>>
>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>
>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still be
>valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that
>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is
>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>
>You are peripheral, or rather not even.
Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n284hj$gsn$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370017 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: >>> DM disqualifies you by its own. >> >>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still >>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that >>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is >>exactly what my Divergent Matter says. >> >>You are peripheral, or rather not even. > > Somebody should ty knots in you neck, > you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll. What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The Theory, is false, are you? In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n284gl$gsm$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370017 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał: >>> DM disqualifies you by its own. >> >>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still >>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that >>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is >>exactly what my Divergent Matter says. >> >>You are peripheral, or rather not even. > > Somebody should ty knots in you neck, > you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll. What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The Theory, is false, are you? In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 12:21 -0800 |
| Subject | Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.14{0.21P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #370027 |
"Ty_Knotts", Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, how should I indentify your posts ? Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 20:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? |
| Message-ID | <n285b8$gsn$6@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #370034 |
W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Jeff-Relf.Me napisał: > "Ty_Knotts", Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, > how should I indentify your posts ? > > Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? I dont understand you. Interested in something specific in Math and Physics, or you just waste your time, something you use to waste anyway. You may block the entire Internet, if is this what you really wish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 16:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? |
| Message-ID | <oc9f4b551vbqnkh7dts4u60f7mbdsb1ndj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #370034 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:21:07 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>"Ty_Knotts", Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting,
>how should I indentify your posts ?
>
>Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?
He will just switch to google groups,
he obviously also has access to a number
of different platforms, he must be a janitor
for a big company or college, like Plutonium.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web