Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357383 > unrolled thread

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-16 17:21 +0200

#357383 — Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

Użytkownik "Sylvia Else"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:d0p0jjFemvlU1@mid.individual.net...

On 16/07/2015 3:55 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 10:23:05 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 16/07/2015 12:53 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>
>>> <http://seprogrammo.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/symmetric-twins-paradox.html>
>>
>> If you had presented the math, we could point to the errors you've made.
>
> Let's write down the Lorentz transform which describes how two 
> observations, by observers 1 and 3 mutually observing 2, are related. 
> <shrug>
>
> **  dt12 = (dt32 - v31 dx32 / c^2) / sqrt(1 - v31^2 / c^2)
> **  dx12 = (dx32 - v31 dt32) / sqrt(1 - v31^2 / c^2)
> **  dy12 = dy32
> **  dz12 = dz32

|Step 1. Define you terms. Forcing the reader to make an educated guess
|leaves you wiggle room for later.

Step 0, Sylvia. Define "define".

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web