Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357383

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

From Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox
Date 2015-07-16 17:21 +0200
Organization ATMAN - ATM S.A.
Message-ID <mo8i6i$a8o$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink)
References <mo5s70$vaf$1@dont-email.me> <d0otdmFdu7qU1@mid.individual.net> <945c6600-740b-4778-939f-d3da514761f5@googlegroups.com> <d0p0jjFemvlU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw



Użytkownik "Sylvia Else"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:d0p0jjFemvlU1@mid.individual.net...

On 16/07/2015 3:55 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 10:23:05 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 16/07/2015 12:53 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>
>>> <http://seprogrammo.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/symmetric-twins-paradox.html>
>>
>> If you had presented the math, we could point to the errors you've made.
>
> Let's write down the Lorentz transform which describes how two 
> observations, by observers 1 and 3 mutually observing 2, are related. 
> <shrug>
>
> **  dt12 = (dt32 - v31 dx32 / c^2) / sqrt(1 - v31^2 / c^2)
> **  dx12 = (dx32 - v31 dt32) / sqrt(1 - v31^2 / c^2)
> **  dy12 = dy32
> **  dz12 = dz32

|Step 1. Define you terms. Forcing the reader to make an educated guess
|leaves you wiggle room for later.

Step 0, Sylvia. Define "define".

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-16 17:21 +0200

csiph-web