Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614563 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-06 11:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-07-07 20:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 152 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:05 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:09 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:14 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:17 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:32 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 11:51 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 12:19 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-07 15:26 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 01:14 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 09:33 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-07 14:57 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 13:33 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 07:30 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-07 16:34 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 07:51 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-07 16:52 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 07:57 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-07 17:04 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-07 16:31 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:02 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-08 12:09 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-07-08 01:15 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 21:45 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 12:47 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 12:48 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 13:16 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 13:17 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-06 15:17 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 13:32 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-06 16:03 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 13:37 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-06 16:06 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-06 11:59 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-06 23:07 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 14:46 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-06 21:07 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 20:11 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-07 10:14 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 01:40 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 10:57 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-07 22:12 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 12:43 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Kalaki Kalacos <oiis@nnnhgsoi.nd> - 2023-07-07 17:55 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:16 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-08 12:28 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:10 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:15 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-09 11:59 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-09 15:09 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 18:15 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-07 22:13 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 14:22 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Duston Pantelakos <eats@sonknkdt.tt> - 2023-07-07 21:15 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 20:20 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-08 13:45 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-06 22:54 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 20:59 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 01:16 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 21:13 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-07 10:10 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 09:28 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:09 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 18:30 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 18:33 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-08 03:16 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:08 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-08 03:33 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 09:31 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 00:45 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-08 09:49 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-07 18:49 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-07 12:20 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 02:24 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 07:00 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-07 17:37 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 07:53 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:05 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-08 11:52 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 12:50 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 09:51 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 23:55 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:07 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:37 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:42 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:45 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 22:00 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:33 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 16:07 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:10 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 16:59 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 22:31 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:30 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:28 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:42 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:02 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-08 18:54 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:58 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 14:15 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:13 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 19:29 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:19 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Norge Brisimitzakis <niig@tbirsnii.ie> - 2023-07-07 18:31 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:36 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 19:06 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 13:16 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 20:47 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 13:50 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-07 21:12 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 09:26 +0200
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:17 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 17:40 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-07 18:51 -0500
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mervin Paraskevopoulos <eepk@aupoavsa.sl> - 2023-07-07 18:19 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 17:28 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Bertin Lolos <rblb@ltinllrt.ot> - 2023-07-07 21:53 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-07 23:46 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Nolberto Eliopoulos <looo@btoloene.pb> - 2023-07-08 19:29 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-08 12:58 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Bondie Antonopoulos <oebo@niononud.te> - 2023-07-08 20:36 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-08 15:32 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Michaes Egonidis <esnh@soddssei.si> - 2023-07-08 23:10 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 13:59 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Jeff Egonidis <noig@iegoiiio.nf> - 2023-07-09 18:20 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-06 14:56 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-07 11:06 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:22 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-07 14:28 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Deangelo Sfakianos <enoe@adaonlnd.eo> - 2023-07-07 19:28 +0000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 20:28 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-08 13:50 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 20:52 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-08 14:56 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:32 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-09 10:48 +1000
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 19:16 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-07-09 12:04 +0300
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 00:04 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 21:15 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:24 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 13:32 -0400
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:15 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 15:03 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:20 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 22:13 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 22:47 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 22:59 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 23:13 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 23:37 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 23:39 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 23:47 -0700
Re: A sniper bullet trajectory & relativity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 20:50 -0700
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 23:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u8amns$1ks4t$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #614645 |
On 7/7/2023 12:51 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 18:50:46 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> On 7/7/2023 10:00 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> I don't have my primary source handy because I'm not very interested in criticizin Einstein, but, thanks to Pentcho Valev >> Stop right there. Pentcho is just about the nuttiest relativity crackpot > > > And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy > is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot, > stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your > moronic religion. What part of "not even wrong" don't you understand, janitor?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 21:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d8713349-b166-4e17-b8da-c1c9b1329f33n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614728 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:55:43 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 7/7/2023 12:51 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 18:50:46 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >> On 7/7/2023 10:00 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> I don't have my primary source handy because I'm not very interested in criticizin Einstein, but, thanks to Pentcho Valev > > >> Stop right there. Pentcho is just about the nuttiest relativity crackpot > > > > > > And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy > > is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot, > > stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your > > moronic religion. > > What part of "not even wrong" don't you understand, janitor? Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 21:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ddd50dcf-ef8a-4f0b-a185-ee26d1fbf4c0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614731 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. Logic has NOTHING to do with it. Relativity is not exactly logical, but if you want to overturn it, only evidence counts. Evidence rules... got any? So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 21:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <db6c703c-9530-416e-870b-46b67b8b07c7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614741 |
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your insane religion, Al. > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! Some other cults were holding much longer. And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep measuring t'=t in improper seconds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 21:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <de591076-fd15-4ac0-bfe9-a7135002b716n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614742 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it > Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > insane religion, Al. > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > Some other cults were holding much longer. > And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > measuring t'=t in improper seconds. Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... and he has been dead for a number of years now...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 22:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <791738af-5ff7-4f8b-88b5-0cab4640024cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614743 |
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > > > > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it > > Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > > insane religion, Al. > > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > > Some other cults were holding much longer. > > And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > > by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > > measuring t'=t in improper seconds. > Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5d6710fb-e292-48ac-8d43-623d69a62b06n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614745 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:00:48 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > > > > > > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it > > > Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > > > insane religion, Al. > > > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > > > Some other cults were holding much longer. > > > And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > > > by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > > > measuring t'=t in improper seconds. > > Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... > Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes > no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking. Relativity is so illogical it is barking mad. It even denies relative velocities for light when all velocities are relative.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 16:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u8cfm9$1r7lk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #614773 |
On 7/8/2023 1:33 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:00:48 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. >>>>> >>>>> Logic has NOTHING to do with it >>>> Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your >>>> insane religion, Al. >>>>> So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! >>>> Some other cults were holding much longer. >>>> And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden >>>> by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep >>>> measuring t'=t in improper seconds. >>> Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... >> Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes >> no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking. > Relativity is so illogical it is barking mad. It even denies relative velocities for light when all velocities are relative. Nobody cares whether you're barking mad. Scientists care about the results of experimental evidence and scientific observations. Do you have any actual evidence that relativity is wrong? Evidence rules, every crank here drools.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 13:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <017f207a-6e76-408f-9dae-55468c4fff61n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614789 |
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:07:46 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 7/8/2023 1:33 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:00:48 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > >>>>> > >>>>> Logic has NOTHING to do with it > >>>> Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > >>>> insane religion, Al. > >>>>> So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > >>>> Some other cults were holding much longer. > >>>> And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > >>>> by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > >>>> measuring t'=t in improper seconds. > >>> Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... > >> Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes > >> no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking. > > > Relativity is so illogical it is barking mad. It even denies relative velocities for light when all velocities are relative. > Nobody cares whether you're barking mad. Scientists care about the > results of experimental evidence and scientific observations. Do you > have any actual evidence that relativity is wrong? Evidence rules, every > crank here drools. You have your head in the sand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 16:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u8cio3$1rlgg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #614790 |
On 7/8/2023 4:10 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:07:46 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: >> On 7/8/2023 1:33 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:00:48 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Logic has NOTHING to do with it >>>>>> Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your >>>>>> insane religion, Al. >>>>>>> So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! >>>>>> Some other cults were holding much longer. >>>>>> And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden >>>>>> by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep >>>>>> measuring t'=t in improper seconds. >>>>> Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... >>>> Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes >>>> no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking. >> >>> Relativity is so illogical it is barking mad. It even denies relative velocities for light when all velocities are relative. >> Nobody cares whether you're barking mad. Scientists care about the >> results of experimental evidence and scientific observations. Do you >> have any actual evidence that relativity is wrong? Evidence rules, every >> crank here drools. > You have your head in the sand. I'll take that as an admission that you have absolutely no evidence that relativity is wrong. So there is no reason whatsoever for scientists, or anyone following the scientific method, to believe relativity is wrong. All the howling at the moon that you're doing is nothing but a lot of noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 22:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ffb750b9-8b57-45c1-bc8d-f8190cdd33ban@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614799 |
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 22:59:51 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 7/8/2023 4:10 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:07:46 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > >> On 7/8/2023 1:33 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 10:00:48 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:45:19 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>>>> On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Logic has NOTHING to do with it > >>>>>> Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > >>>>>> insane religion, Al. > >>>>>>> So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > >>>>>> Some other cults were holding much longer. > >>>>>> And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > >>>>>> by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > >>>>>> measuring t'=t in improper seconds. > >>>>> Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... > >>>> Al, knowing your inconsistent idiocies makes > >>>> no advantage in anything. Maybe except barking. > >> > >>> Relativity is so illogical it is barking mad. It even denies relative velocities for light when all velocities are relative. > > >> Nobody cares whether you're barking mad. Scientists care about the > >> results of experimental evidence and scientific observations. Do you > >> have any actual evidence that relativity is wrong? Evidence rules, every > >> crank here drools. > > > You have your head in the sand. > I'll take that as an admission that you have absolutely no evidence that > relativity is wrong. And you, stupid Mike, have absolutely no evidence that adjusting clocks to your 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy is some "Newton mode".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <746b6b9e-e77f-4392-8099-cdb4974e962cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614743 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:45:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:42:47 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 06:37:55 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > > > > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it > > Right, logic has NOTHING to do with your > > insane religion, Al. > > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > > Some other cults were holding much longer. > > And in the meantime in the real world, forbidden > > by your insane bunch "improper" clocks keep > > measuring t'=t in improper seconds. > Woz, my dog knows more physics than you do... and he has been dead for a number of years now... Relativity is what top historian of science Stanley Jaki calls a "stillbirth of science."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 10:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a8b9fd91-c3a8-482e-9335-48763d7db0b2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614741 |
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:37:55 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > Logic has NOTHING to do with it. Relativity is not exactly logical, but if you want to overturn it, only evidence counts. > > Evidence rules... got any? > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! You're right. Logic has nothing to do with relativity nor relativity to do with logic. Thanks for admitting it. It's always been overturned in the minds of every logical person without any need to subject it to experiments that relativists willfully misconstrue. It's always been well-known to many highly intelligent scientists that relativity is nonsense. You guys always pretend your interpretation of the experiments proves anything at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 12:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f2579c2-478c-48ac-a9f8-5b2a21cd25a7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614770 |
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 10:28:44 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:37:55 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it. Relativity is not exactly logical, but if you want to overturn it, only evidence counts. > > > > Evidence rules... got any? > > > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > You're right. Logic has nothing to do with relativity nor relativity to do with logic. Thanks for admitting it. It's always been overturned in the minds of every logical person without any need to subject it to experiments that relativists willfully misconstrue. It's always been well-known to many highly intelligent scientists that relativity is nonsense. You guys always pretend your interpretation of the experiments proves anything at all. Although I know you think you understand what you thought I said, I don't think you realize that what you heard is not what I meant...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 13:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <75711b21-32e4-4694-8cd1-76353fe71b0dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614784 |
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 12:43:00 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 10:28:44 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:37:55 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:07:31 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone with reasoning capabilities can understand relativity is a joke and a swindle. > > > Logic has NOTHING to do with it. Relativity is not exactly logical, but if you want to overturn it, only evidence counts. > > > > > > Evidence rules... got any? > > > > > > So far, no one has been able to overturn in, for over 100 years... and I doubt very much that it is going to be you! > > > You're right. Logic has nothing to do with relativity nor relativity to do with logic. Thanks for admitting it. It's always been overturned in the minds of every logical person without any need to subject it to experiments that relativists willfully misconstrue. It's always been well-known to many highly intelligent scientists that relativity is nonsense. You guys always pretend your interpretation of the experiments proves anything at all. > Although I know you think you understand what you thought I said, I don't think you realize that what you heard is not what I meant... Sorry, but my siesta is over, and it's time for something serious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-08 18:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kgub9eFdvkkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #614788 |
On 7/8/2023 3:02 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: <...> > Sorry, but my siesta is over, and it's time for something serious. So when are you going to get serious? All this stuff you've been posting is so much crapola you're attempting to find recognition for by bullying instead of making cogent arguments and using new results from new experiments. All that you've brought to bear in these discussions has been argued relentlessly during the past century. As they say, insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. That places you in the insane category because all you're doing is relentlessly repeating worn out tired old arguments resolved long ago. "Delusional disorder is a type of psychotic disorder. Its main symptom is the presence of one or more delusions. "A delusion is an unshakable belief in something that’s untrue. The belief isn’t a part of the person’s culture or subculture, and almost everyone else knows this belief to be false." <https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9599-delusional-disorder#:~:text=Delusional%20disorder%20is%20a%20type%20of%20psychotic%20disorder.,this%20belief%20to%20be%20false.> The problem is you're doubtless dual diagnosis and the rest makes it all very complicated. Really, don't you have anything better to do? This is all very boring. I've had to cut back reading your stuff to 25% or less and discovered I'm not missing anything relevant. I do believe that even if I killfile your postings completely I won't be missing anything important or of interest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-09 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fe39c13f-d1d2-491d-9bc7-5fd2696f8588n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614808 |
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 4:54:27 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 7/8/2023 3:02 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > <...> > > Sorry, but my siesta is over, and it's time for something serious. > So when are you going to get serious? All this stuff you've been > posting is so much crapola you're attempting to find recognition > for by bullying instead of making cogent arguments and using new > results from new experiments. All that you've brought to bear in these > discussions has been argued relentlessly during the past century. > > As they say, insanity is doing the same thing over and over while > expecting different results. That places you in the insane category > because all you're doing is relentlessly repeating worn out tired > old arguments resolved long ago. > > "Delusional disorder is a type of psychotic disorder. Its main symptom > is the presence of one or more delusions. > > "A delusion is an unshakable belief in something that’s untrue. The > belief isn’t a part of the person’s culture or subculture, and almost > everyone else knows this belief to be false." > > <https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9599-delusional-disorder#:~:text=Delusional%20disorder%20is%20a%20type%20of%20psychotic%20disorder.,this%20belief%20to%20be%20false.> > > The problem is you're doubtless dual diagnosis and the rest makes it all > very complicated. Really, don't you have anything better to do? This is > all very boring. I've had to cut back reading your stuff to 25% or less > and discovered I'm not missing anything relevant. I do believe that even > if I killfile your postings completely I won't be missing anything > important or of interest. "The experts who are leading you may be wrong…I think we live in an unscientific age in which almost all the buffeting of communications and television-words, books, and so on-are unscientific. As a result, there is a considerable amount of intellectual tyranny in the name of science…Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers of the preceding generation.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-09 14:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kh0fagFofuaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #614854 |
On 7/9/2023 1:58 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 4:54:27 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 7/8/2023 3:02 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> >> <...> >>> Sorry, but my siesta is over, and it's time for something serious. >> So when are you going to get serious? All this stuff you've been >> posting is so much crapola you're attempting to find recognition >> for by bullying instead of making cogent arguments and using new >> results from new experiments. All that you've brought to bear in these >> discussions has been argued relentlessly during the past century. >> >> As they say, insanity is doing the same thing over and over while >> expecting different results. That places you in the insane category >> because all you're doing is relentlessly repeating worn out tired >> old arguments resolved long ago. >> >> "Delusional disorder is a type of psychotic disorder. Its main symptom >> is the presence of one or more delusions. >> >> "A delusion is an unshakable belief in something that’s untrue. The >> belief isn’t a part of the person’s culture or subculture, and almost >> everyone else knows this belief to be false." >> >> <https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9599-delusional-disorder#:~:text=Delusional%20disorder%20is%20a%20type%20of%20psychotic%20disorder.,this%20belief%20to%20be%20false.> >> >> The problem is you're doubtless dual diagnosis and the rest makes it all >> very complicated. Really, don't you have anything better to do? This is >> all very boring. I've had to cut back reading your stuff to 25% or less >> and discovered I'm not missing anything relevant. I do believe that even >> if I killfile your postings completely I won't be missing anything >> important or of interest. > "The experts who are leading you may be wrong…I think we > live in an unscientific age in which almost all the buffeting of communications and television-words, > books, and so on-are unscientific. As a result, there is a considerable amount of intellectual tyranny in > the name of science…Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of > belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers of the preceding generation.” ibid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 21:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <483c56a8-3aeb-4b95-9c7c-9e4bb2ed5dc0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #614728 |
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 05:55:43 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 7/7/2023 12:51 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 18:50:46 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >> On 7/7/2023 10:00 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> I don't have my primary source handy because I'm not very interested in criticizin Einstein, but, thanks to Pentcho Valev > > >> Stop right there. Pentcho is just about the nuttiest relativity crackpot > > > > > > And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy > > is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot, > > stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your > > moronic religion. > > What part of "not even wrong" don't you understand, janitor? Of course it is not wrong, you've written many times that Cs 9 192 631 770 clocks are in "Newton mode". At least you're ashamed of that... but somehow it's not preventing you from repeating this nonsense. Well, you're such an amazing idiot, stupid Mike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-07 19:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kgr0caFsegpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #614644 |
On 2023-07-07 16:50:44 +0000, Volney said: > On 7/7/2023 10:00 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 6:07:16 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: >>> On 7/6/2023 5:46 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 2:07:56 PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> A long-distance shot by a sniper (shooting from a train) must take into >>>>>> account wind. If the trajectory of the bullet shows the lack of any wind, >>>>>> it does not show the bullet does not share the velocity of the source. It >>>>>> does not show the bullet velocity is independent of the source. It does >>>>>> not confirm the constancy or invariance of the bullet's speed. It still >>>>>> shares the velocity of the source. Therefore, the MMX did not prove the >>>>>> constancy of the speed of light. >>>>> Of course it didn't. >>>>> Why kick down this open door once again? >>>>> (and worse, with faulty arguments) >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>> Because Einstein and many relativists continue to claim the MMX proved >>>> the constancy of light speed when that is obviously a stupid >>>> conflation. It did not provide any evidence for it at all. > >>> Einstein never claimed the speed of light was constant because of the >>> MMX. He stated the speed of light may be constant simply because that's >>> what all the experimental results stated. >>> >>> (why do the anti-relativity cranks have to make up false reasons for >>> belief in a constant speed of light?) > >> I don't have my primary source handy because I'm not very interested in >> criticizin Einstein, but, thanks to Pentcho Valev > > Stop right there. Pentcho is just about the nuttiest relativity > crackpot ever to darken this newsgroup. Maybe, but there is quite a lot of competition for that title! > I already told you this. Half of his references don't claim what > Pentcho claims, the rest are cranks just as nutty as he is. The important thing to realize about Pentcho Valev is not just that he's nutty and a crank, but he's also a liar. He quote-mines and finds something that he thinks will fool us into thinking it supports his position, and posts it wthut paying any attention to the qualifications and explanations the author made. > > <snip rest, unread> -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web